A Collection of Chirurgical TractsBeckett, William
Science
A Collection of Chirurgical Tracts
Beckett, William
Surgery
Having truly related what was done, in the Case of Dr _Keil_, I hope
it may appear, that I have acted an honest, and not an unskilful Part
in it: If what was prescribed by others of greater Fame, when it came
to be tried, had not better Success, I presume I shall no longer be
blamed for it. No Man would willingly lose any Reputation, who is to
live by it. I question not, but the best _Surgeons_ in the World will
allow, there are Cases for which there is no Remedy: And he who frankly
owns thus much, no more loses any Reputation, than the Quack, that
promises greater Matters than he afterwards performs, gets any: And I
think they, who have censured me, would have done more ingenuously, if
they would rather have looked upon the present Case as incurable by any
_Surgeon_, than have thrown their Aspersions upon me, as not treating
it properly.
_N. B._ The foregoing remarkable _Case_ of Dr _Keil_, was published
by Mr _Rushworth_ of _Northampton_, Surgeon at _Oxford_, in the Year
1719[3]. Under the _Imprimatur_ of _Robert Shippen_, Vice-Can. _Oxon._
[3] Mr _Rushworth_ died 1737, and it is here inserted in Justice to
his Memory.
_Some_ curious Observations _made_ (_by my Friend_ John Ranby,
_Esq_; _Surgeon to his Majesty’s Household_, _and F. R. S._) _in
the_ Dissection _of_ Three Subjects, 1728.
The _first_, a Man aged 70 Years, who died of a Suppression of Urine,
occasioned by a Stone stopping in the _Urethra_, just within the
_Glans_, of the bigness of a Horse Bean. This Appearance, with the
Symptoms that had attended this miserable Man, gave me reason to
expect something remarkable in the urinary Passages. The _Ureters_ and
_Pelvis_ were very much distended; which is common where great Numbers
of Stones have descended down them, from the Kidneys to the Bladder.
The Bladder contained about 60 Stones, the largest of which was about
the Size of a Walnut, the others smaller; and just within the Neck, was
a hard _Tumour_, as big as a Nutmeg, which almost closed the Orifice:
and indeed the Situation of this Tumour was such, that it not only made
the passing the _Catheter_ very difficult, and hindered our feeling the
Stones, by directing the Instrument upwards: but likewise would alone
produce the Symptoms of the Stone in the Bladder, by obstructing the
free Discharge of Urine through the _Urethra_, the inner Membrane of
which appeared as if lacerated in several Places, and the Tube filled
with a glutinous Matter tinged with Blood. On the back Part of the
_Vesiculæ Seminales_, near the _Prostata_, were several _Stones_, as
large as Peas, which closely adhered to the adjacent Membranes.
The _second_, a Boy aged 10 Years, killed by a Blow on the Skull; whose
Spleen weighed two Pounds, and possessed almost all the left Side
of the abdominal Cavity. The Bladder, when distended to its greatest
Capacity, would not contain an _Ounce_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account