A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 3, part 1: Andrew Jackson (Second Term)
History
A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 3, part 1: Andrew Jackson (Second Term)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; Presidents -- United States; United States -- History -- Sources; United States -- Politics and government
The extreme and culpable indiscretion of Mr. ---- in this transaction
was strikingly illustrated by a remark of Mr. Pageot, after a careful
examination of the letter of 23d April, that although without
instructions from his Government he would venture to assure me that
the Duke de Broglie could not have expected Mr. ---- to make such
a communication to the Secretary of State. Declining to enter into
the consideration of what the Duke might have expected or intended,
I was satisfied with the assurances Mr. Pageot gave me that he would
immediately state what had occurred to his Government.
All which is respectfully submitted, with the hope, if the course
pursued is approved by the President, that this report may be filed
in this Department with the letters to which it refers.
JOHN FORSYTH.
_Mr. Forsyth to Mr. Livingston_.
No. 50.
[Extract.]
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
_Washington, March 5, 1835_.
EDWARD LIVINGSTON, Esq.,
_Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary, Paris_.
SIR: In my note No. 49 you were informed that the last letter of
M. Sérurier would be made the subject of separate and particular
instructions to you. Unwilling to add to the irritation produced by
recent incidents in our relations with France, the President will not
take for granted that the very exceptionable language of the French
minister was used by the orders or will be countenanced by the authority
of the King of France. You will therefore, as early as practicable after
this reaches you, call the attention of the minister of foreign affairs
to the following passage in M. Sérurier's letter:
"Les plaintes que porte M. le Président centre le prétendu
non-accomplissement des engagemens pris par le Gouvernement du Roi à
la suite du vote du 1er avril 1834, ne sont pas seulement étrangé par
l'entière inexactitude des allégations sur lesquelles elles reposent,
mais aussi parceque les explications qu'a reçues à Paris M. Livingston,
et celles que le soussigné a données directement an cabinet de
Washington semblaient ne pas laisser même la possibilité d'un
malentendu sur des points aussi délicats."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account