The first foundations of history are very often mere traditions, which
are transmitted from parents to their children, from one generation to
another. Probable only in their origin, they become less probable in
every succeeding age. In process of time fable gains and truth loses
ground. Hence it is almost impossible to ascertain the origin of any
place claiming a high antiquity. The early writers could not divest
their minds of the fascinating fables of Geoffrey of Monmouth. In former
times, when the power of imagination prevailed, the distinction between
legend and history was scarcely recognised. For centuries there are not
even legendary accounts of East Anglia or of its capital. But instead of
legends, there are permanent memorials of the past; great earthworks,
fortifications, camps, strongholds, buildings, churches, ruins of
monasteries and abbeys. The soil has yielded up relics of the
dead—weapons, utensils, coins, ornaments, and sepulchral urns, showing
the presence of the Iceni, the Romans, the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Danes,
and Normans, at different periods. All these energetic nations were
concerned in events that took place in Norfolk and Norwich.
The Iceni appear to have been politically independent up to the period of
the Roman invasion, B.C. 55. Their alarm in consequence of that invasion
led them to negociate an alliance, but we have no reason to suppose that
it was ever carried into effect. They took the lead in a rebellion which
the Roman General Ostorius was barely able to quell; and Roman historians
bear testimony to the valour with which they struggled to maintain their
liberty. The superior discipline of the Roman soldiers enabled them,
however, to triumph over a semi-barbarous people, unprotected by body
armour and unused to military tactics; but it was no easy victory. For
about 600 years after the defeat of the Iceni, no reliable information
respecting that people is to be found in any history. Indeed they
disappear from history altogether, and we can only infer what advances
they made in civilization from the scattered remains that have been found
in the eastern counties. These remains prove that the Iceni were not
semi-savages, but that they had made some progress in useful arts, that
they built houses, and wore woven garments.
There are no remains in the eastern counties of cairns, cromlechs,
Druidical circles, or other memorials of ancient perseverance and
mechanical skill, nature having interposed an absolute veto. But there
are remains of earth works and tumuli, burrows or artificial mounds in
which were deposited the urns or ashes of the dead. There are thousands
of pits in many places, and these are supposed to have been the
foundations of Icenian houses. Remarkable excavations are thickly
clustered all over Weybourne Heath, varying from 8 to 20 feet in
diameter, and from 2 to 6 feet in depth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account