March 18th. Dr. Henry Bathurst (one of the prebendaries of Durham) was
elected bishop of Norwich by the dean and chapter. He soon made himself
universally beloved by the clergy and the citizens. Professor Taylor
gave the following account of the late and also of the newly appointed
bishop:—
“In 1805, Dr. Bathurst succeeded Dr. Sutton as bishop of Norwich.
The latter, who had been translated to the See of Canterbury, was a
man of polished manners, extravagant habits, and courtier-like
address. He was too polite to quarrel with anybody and too prudent
to provoke controversy. He neither felt nor affected to feel any
horror of Unitarians. He invited them to his table, and at the
request of the mayor, he preached a charity sermon at St. George’s
Colegate, knowing that my father had been asked and had consented to
write the hymns.”
“Dr. Bathurst removed from Durham to Norwich, and as he was a
stranger in his new residence, never having taken any prominent part
as a public man, little expectation was excited as to his future
conduct. He was known to owe his elevation to his relation, Lord
Bathurst; and it was generally taken for granted that his views on
public affairs were similar to those of the administration of which
that noble lord was a member. Curiosity led me to the Cathedral to
hear the new bishop’s primary charge, and I soon found the spirit it
breathed to resemble the benevolence that beamed from his
countenance.”
“What the bishop preached he also practised. He never shrunk from
appearing to be what he really was, nor while he received a dissenter
in his study with politeness would he pass him unnoticed in the
street. He was to be seen walking arm-in-arm with persons, of all
persuasions, whom he respected, in the streets of Norwich. He was
not afraid of shaking ‘brother Madge,’ as he called him, by the hand,
nor of welcoming Unitarians to his table. What he was as a member of
the house of peers, on all occasions in which the great principles of
religious liberty were concerned, is well known. I have only here to
speak of his conduct as a resident in Norwich.”
Sept 3rd. The committee of the court of guardians appointed to examine
the poor rates of the city and hamlets, for the purpose of obtaining a
more equal assessment, made their report, in which they stated that an
increase of £16,000 stock and £1800 rent, calculating on the half rental
only, might be made, and recommended a general survey and new valuation
to be taken, in consequence of the great alteration which had taken place
in property since 1786, when the previous survey was taken.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account