A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian eraWallace, R. (Robert)
Religion
A dissertation on the true age of the world : $b in which is determined the chronology of the period from creation to the Christian era
Wallace, R. (Robert)
Bible; Chronology; Chronology, Historical
Dr. Hales, in his “Analysis,” vol. ii. p. 1354, gives the following
explanation of the “_enigmatical_ number of the name of the second
_Beast_, in its second stage, after the _image_ was made,” from
_Fuardentius_, an early Romish writer, followed by _Walmsley_. The
number 666 is the numeral amount of [Mahomet] the _False Prophet’s_
name, written Μοαμετις or Μαομετις, by the Greek Historians _Zonaras_
and _Cedrenus_:—
Μ, Α, Ο, Μ, Ε, Τ, Ι, Σ.
40 + 1 + 70 + 40 + 5 + 300 + 10 + 200 = 666.
This is very curious, and indicates the strong likeness between
_Popery_ and _Islamism_, in some grand point, namely, _the Spirit of
Persecution_!! John xiii. 35. The following explanation of the number
of the Beast, is taken from Mr. Cuninghame’s “Supplement to the
Scientific Chronology of the year 1839,” pp. 28, 29. “In my
Dissertation on the Seals, I have adopted the usual Protestant
Solution and application of this number, as being found [first by
Irenæus] in the name of LATINUS, the founder of the LATIN KINGDOM,
written with the epsilon, Λατείνος, according to the ancient Greek
orthography; or, if it be written without the ε, according to the
later usage, then we owe to Mr. Clarke the important discovery, that
is found in the name of the LATIN KINGDOM,—Ἡ Λατίνη Βασίλεία.
Λ = 30 Ἡ = 8 Β = 2
α = 1 α = 1
τ = 300 Λ = 30 σ = 200
ε = 5 α = 1 ι = 10
ι = 10 τ = 300 λ = 30
ν = 50 ι = 10 ε = 5
ο = 70 ν = 50 ι = 10
ς = 200 η = 8 α = 1
———— ———— ————
666 = 407 + 259
Now, without in the least departing from this interpretation, I
remark, that while it correctly ascertains the PERSON or POWER to whom
this number belongs, namely, THE LATIN EMPIRE, BOTH SECULAR AND
SPIRITUAL; yet it does not COUNT or COMPUTE the number itself, or
discover to us its ROOT in arithmetic. The expression, _Let him that
hath understanding_ COUNT, “Ψηφισατω”, _the number of the Beast_,
cannot mean to find the number itself, for this is given; nor does it
merely signify to find out the name which expresses that number; but
it also means that the root of the number must be found, and the
number computed from it; and further, it signifies, I apprehend, that
we must apply the number to the chronology of the Beast himself, in
connection with that of the World, in which he exercises his
dominion.”
Footnote 38:
See _Note A_. p. 130.
Footnote 39:
This abstract of his arguments was communicated to the author by Mr.
Cuninghame.
Footnote 40:
See _Note B_. p. 132.
Footnote 41:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account