A Distinguished Provincial at ParisBalzac, Honoré de
General
A Distinguished Provincial at Paris
Balzac, Honoré de
France -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; French fiction -- Translations into English
“Oh! I thought you were cleverer than that, youngster,” said Blondet.
“No. Upon my word, as I looked at that forehead of yours, I credited you
with the omnipotence of the great mind—the power of seeing both sides
of everything. In literature, my boy, every idea is reversible, and no
man can take upon himself to decide which is the right or wrong side.
Everything is bi-lateral in the domain of thought. Ideas are binary.
Janus is a fable signifying criticism and the symbol of Genius. The
Almighty alone is triform. What raises Molière and Corneille above the
rest of us but the faculty of saying one thing with an Alceste or an
Octave, and another with a Philinte or a Cinna? Rousseau wrote a letter
against dueling in the _Nouvelle_ Héloïse, and another in favor of it.
Which of the two represented his own opinion? will you venture to
take it upon yourself to decide? Which of us could give judgement for
Clarissa or Lovelace, Hector or Achilles? Who was Homer’s hero? What did
Richardson himself think? It is the function of criticism to look at a
man’s work in all its aspects. We draw up our case, in short.”
“Do you really stick to your written opinions?” asked Vernou, with a
satirical expression. “Why, we are retailers of phrases; that is how we
make a livelihood. When you try to do a good piece of work—to write a
book, in short—you can put your thoughts, yourself into it, and cling
to it, and fight for it; but as for newspaper articles, read to-day and
forgotten to-morrow, they are worth nothing in my eyes but the money
that is paid for them. If you attach any importance to such drivel, you
might as well make the sign of the Cross and invoke heaven when you sit
down to write a tradesman’s circular.”
Every one apparently was astonished at Lucien’s scruples. The last rags
of the boyish conscience were torn away, and he was invested with the
_toga virilis_ of journalism.
“Do you know what Nathan said by way of comforting himself after your
criticism?” asked Lousteau.
“How should I know?”
“Nathan exclaimed, ‘Paragraphs pass away; but a great work lives!’ He
will be here to supper in two days, and he will be sure to fall flat at
your feet, and kiss your claws, and swear that you are a great man.”
“That would be a funny thing,” was Lucien’s comment.
“_Funny_” repeated Blondet. “He can’t help himself.”
“I am quite willing, my friends,” said Lucien, on whom the wine had
begun to take effect. “But what am I to say?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account