A Gallant of Lorraine; vol. 1 of 2: François, Seigneur de Bassompierre, Marquis d'Haronel, Maréchal de France, 1579-1646Williams, H. Noel (Hugh Noel)
History
A Gallant of Lorraine; vol. 1 of 2: François, Seigneur de Bassompierre, Marquis d'Haronel, Maréchal de France, 1579-1646
Williams, H. Noel (Hugh Noel)
Bassompierre, François de, 1579-1646; France -- Court and courtiers; France -- History -- Bourbons, 1589-1789
[94] The young Duc de Mayenne, son of the old chief of the League, who
had died in October, 1611.
[95] Saint-Paul, a soldier of fortune, was one of the four marshals
created by the Duc de Mayenne in 1593. He was lieutenant of Charles,
Duc de Guise in his government of Champagne, and rendered himself
intensely unpopular with the inhabitants of Rheims by various acts
of oppression. Guise killed him with his own hand, in the Place
de la Cathédrale there, on April 25, 1597. For a full account of
this incident and also of the affair of the Chevalier de Guise and
the Baron de Luz, see the author’s “The Brood of False Lorraine”
(Hutchinson, 1919).
[96] The Duc de Guise was Governor of Provence.
[97] After the death of his elder brother, the Cardinal de Bourbon,
the Prince de Conti had been placed in possession of the Abbey
of Saint-Germain-des-Prés, which had been one of the cardinal’s
benefices. The Queen was offering to the Princess de Conti, in the
event of her widowhood, the reversion of these revenues.
[98] _Histoire de France jusqu’en 1789._
[99] They did not fail of their reward, Bassompierre tells us, for
one of them, Masurier, was presently appointed First President of the
Parlement of Toulouse, while the other, Mangot, became First President
of that of Bordeaux, and was afterwards made Keeper of the Seals.
[100] “This dignity, formerly so respected, had been conferred
lavishly since the Wars of the League, but it had not been degraded
to this point. Concini having never borne arms, they were obliged to
renounce in his case the ancient custom of the new marshal of France
presenting himself to the Parlement, accompanied by an advocate,
who expounded his claims and his valiant deeds. There is a limit to
everything, even to the impudence of flatterers.”--Henri Martin.
[101] Malherbe’s letters contain some interesting observations
concerning the Queen and Bassompierre: “20 October [1613]. I am told
that 51 [the Queen] has not spoken to him [Bassompierre] for a week.
It is believed that 65 [Concini] has done him a bad turn. The affair
is patched up to some extent, to which 59 [Guise] has contributed
much. I have seen him [Bassompierre] to-day in the cabinet, but much
less impudent than he usually is, and 51 [the Queen] never spoke to
him at all. It will pass.
“27 October. The disfavour of 66 [Bassompierre] continues visibly;
the cause is the alliance of 55 [Concini] and 69 [Villeroy], who
have both told 51 [the Queen] that, when they were on bad terms, 66
[Bassompierre] betrayed them both, and, besides, had given her to
understand that he boasts of her favour.
“24 November 66 [Bassompierre] is in less disfavour; but I fear that
he will never be again as he has been.
“27 November. I have seen 66 [Bassompierre], so that I believe the
disagreement is patched up, or will be patched up.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account