A guide to the history of physical educationLeonard, Fred Eugene
History
A guide to the history of physical education
Leonard, Fred Eugene
Physical education and training; Physical education and training -- History
But this is not the type of work which Roberts advocated in 1887, when
he was called from Boston to Springfield, or for which he is remembered
in Association circles today. After a few years of experience, he says,
it began to dawn upon him that health did not necessarily improve as
strength increased, and that the Winship plan of heavy lifting was not
calculated to yield “the greatest good to the greatest number, physically
speaking,” any more than the Dio Lewis exercises, which he considered
too light and easy. “I noticed when I taught slow, heavy, fancy, and
more advanced work in acrobatics, gymnastics, athletics, etc.,” he
writes,[275] “that I would have a very large membership at the first of
the year, but that they would soon drop out because they could not do
the work, and ... the weak members would not renew the next season.... I
give most of my attention to those who need it most, the beginners and
those who cannot for various reasons do the more advanced work. By ...
pushing simple work I can get more men to go into it, and find it easier
to find leaders to teach it, and also can run more classes in a day....
In competitive work and the harder kind of safe exercises ... the men
leave the classes and become spectators, but when I teach easier work
the crowd do the work and the few look on.” He was also led to emphasize
trunk exercises rather than those of the legs and arms, in order to
influence respiration and circulation favorably and keep the abdominal
organs in a condition of healthy activity; and special attention was
given to those muscles which expand the chest, draw back the head and
shoulders, and hold the body erect.
According to the Roberts “platform,” as it came to be known, all
exercises should be “safe, short, easy, beneficial, and pleasing.” They
must be safe for the man who does them, _i.e._, well within the limits
of his capacity at the time. When apparatus is employed such work must
be selected that the members of the squad or class follow each other
rapidly, without tedious waits. No exercise must represent more than
a slight advance over others which have preceded it. Each “must serve
some definite and useful end,” instead of being chosen at random and
with nothing in mind beyond the mere desire to keep the class busy. It
must give pleasure if it is to exert its full effect and not degenerate
into a sort of monotonous and mechanical “grind.” These principles found
illustration in the _Roberts Dumb-bell Drill_, the _Home Dumb-bell
Drill_, and the little volume of _Classified Gymnasium Exercises, with
Notes_,[276] which were very generally used in Association gymnasia
thirty years ago.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account