A Hind Let Loose: Or, An Historical Representation of the Testimonies of the Church of Scotland for the Interest of Christ. With the True State Thereof in All Its PeriodsShields, Alexander
History
A Hind Let Loose: Or, An Historical Representation of the Testimonies of the Church of Scotland for the Interest of Christ. With the True State Thereof in All Its Periods
Shields, Alexander
Church of Scotland -- Controversial literature; Church of Scotland -- History; Covenanters; Scotland -- Church history
'James the VII. II. by the V. of G. king of Scotland, England,
France, and Ireland, defender of the antichristian faith: To all
and sundry our good subjects, whom these presents do, or may
concern: greeting. We having taken into our royal consideration,
the many and great inconveniencies which have happened in that our
ancient kingdom of Scotland, especially of late years, through the
persuasions of the christian religion, and the great heats and
animosities, betwixt the professors thereof, and our good and
faithful subjects, whose faith and religion is subject and
subservient to our royal will (the supreme law, and reason, and
public conscience) to the disappointment of our projects, restraint
of our pleasures, and contempt of the royal power, converting true
loyalty and absolute subjection, into words and names (which we
care not for) of religion and liberty, conscience and the word of
God, thereby withdrawing some to the christian faction, from an
absolute and implicit subjection to us and our will, as if there
were a superior law to which they might appeal; and considering
that these rebellious christians do never cease to assert and
maintain strange paradoxes, such principles as are inconsistent
with the glory and interest of our government, as that the
authority of kings should be hemmed in with limits, and that their
acts and actions are to be examined by another rule than their own
authority to make them lawful, that some things in the kingdom are
not subject to the king's authority, that there is a kingdom within
a kingdom not subordinate to the king, and that there is another
King superior to the supreme whom they will rather obey than us,
and that we must either take laws from him, or otherwise we are no
magistrates; and considering also their practices are conform to
their principles, they will not obey our laws, but the laws of
another inconsistent with ours, and will calculate their religion
according to his laws, and not according to ours, and continually
make their addresses to, and receive ambassadors from a prince whom
we know not, whom our predecessors, of truly worthy memory, did
crucify, one Jesus who was dead, whom they affirm to be alive,
whose government they alledge is supreme over all kings, whom they
acknowledge but as his vassals: being now by favourable fortune,
not only brought to the imperial crown of these kingdoms through
the greatest difficulties, but preserved upon the throne of our
royal ancestors, which from our great founder Nimrod of glorious
memory, and our illustrious predecessors Pharaoh, Nebuchadnezzar,
Herod the great, Nero, Caligula, &c. of blessed and pious memory,
hath been ever opposite to, and projecting the destruction of that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account