A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 1 (of 2)Perrot, Georges
History
A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 1 (of 2)
Perrot, Georges
Art -- Egypt -- History; Egypt -- Antiquities
Thus some triangular prisms of granite have been found at the foot of
the pyramid of Chephren, which seem to have formed part of its lower
casing.[221] Such a section seems, upon paper, the simplest that could
be adopted for the filling in of the angle between two of the steps,
but it is far inferior in solidity to the trapezoidal section. The
prisms had no alliance one with another; they had to depend for their
security entirely upon their adherence to the faces of the graded
core, so that they could easily be carried off, or become dislocated
from natural causes. This system, unlike the first described, did not
give a homogeneous envelope with a thickness of its own, and partly
independent of the monument which it protected.[222]
[221] BÆDEKER, _Egypt_, part i. p. 338 (ed. of 1878). Herodotus
(ii. 127) says that the first course of the Great Pyramid was
built of a parti-coloured Ethiopian stone (ὑποδείμας τὸν πρῶτον
δόμον λίθου Αἰθιοπικοῦ ποικίλου). By Ethiopian stone we must
understand, as several illustrations prove, the granite of
Syene. The Greek historian seems to have thought that the whole
of the first course, throughout the thickness of the pyramid,
was of this stone. His mistake was a natural one. In his time
the pyramid was in a good state of preservation, and he never
thought of asking whether or no the core was of the same
material as the outer case.
[222] On the other hand, these awkwardly shaped prisms offered
less inducement to those who looked upon the pyramids as open
quarries than the easily squared blocks of Cheops, while their
position in the angles of the internal masonry enabled them to
keep their places independently of the lower courses of the
casing.--ED.
[Illustration: FIG. 155.--The casing of the pyramids; drawn in
perspective from the elevation of Perring.]
The casing of the Second Pyramid, moreover, does not seem to have been
carried out on the same principle from top to bottom. The upper part,
which still remains in place, is composed of a hard cement formed of
chalk, gypsum, and pieces of burnt brick. They may have wished to
obtain the parti-coloured effect of which Philo speaks, by making
simultaneous use of granite and concrete, and it is quite possible
that yet other materials entered into the composition of the
casing.[223]
[223] The determination to use a concrete such as that described
affords a good reason for the prismatic shape of the granite
blocks used in the lower courses. It would evidently be easy
enough to cover the pyramid with a coat of cement--working
downwards--if its surface did not greatly overpass the salient
angles of the steps, while the difficulty would be enormously
increased if the coat were to have a considerable thickness of
its own independently of the pyramid, like the casing shown in
Fig. 155.--ED.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account