A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 2 (of 2)Perrot, Georges
History
A History of Art in Ancient Egypt, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Perrot, Georges
Art -- Egypt -- History; Egypt -- Antiquities
[125] _Description, Antiquités_, vol. v. pp. 120, 121. In their
_Description Générale de Thèbes_ (ch. ix. section 8, § 2), the
same writers add: "We are confirmed in our opinion by the
discovery on a bas-relief of four lotus stems with their flowers
surmounted by hawks and statues, and placed exactly in the same
fashion as the columns which we have just described. They are
votive columns. We are also confirmed in this opinion by the
fact that we find things like them among those amulets which
reproduce the various objects in the temples in small." This
bas-relief is figured in the third volume of plates of the
_Description_, pl. 33, Fig. 1.
[126] MARIETTE, _Karnak_, p. 19, pl. 4. _Voyage dans la
Haute-Égypte_, pp. 13, 21, 22.
[Illustration: Ch. Chipiez del Hibon sc.
THEBES
PORTICO IN THE TEMPLE OF MEDINET-ABOU (SECOND COURT)
Restored by Ch. Chipiez.
Imp. Ch. Chardon]
[Illustration: FIG. 129.--Anta and column at Medinet-Abou.]
[Illustration: FIG. 130.--Column in the court of the Bubastides, at
Karnak.]
The most probable explanation is that which we have hinted at
above.[127] These great columns were erected to give majesty to the
approach to the hypostyle hall, and to border the path followed by the
great religious processions as they issued from the hall and made for
the great doorway in the pylon. They must always have been isolated,
and it is possible that formerly each carried upon the cubic die which
still surmounts the capital, groups of bronze similar to those which,
to all appearance, crowned those stele-like piers which we described
in speaking of the work of Thothmes in the same temple (page 94). This
was also the opinion of Prisse d'Avennes, who studied the monuments of
Egypt, both as an artist and as an archæologist, more closely,
perhaps, than any one else.[128] It has been objected that the
columns would hide each other, and that the symbolic animals perched
upon their summits could not have been seen; but this would only be
the case with those who looked at them from certain disadvantageous
positions--from between the columns, or exactly on their alignment.
From the middle of the avenue, or from one side of it, they would be
clearly visible, and the vivid colours of their enamels would produce
their full effect.
[127] This explanation seems to have been accepted by Prof.
EBERS; _Ægypten im Bild und Wort_, vol. ii. p. 331.
[128] MAXIME DU CAMP, _Le Nil_, p. 251.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account