A History of Booksellers, the Old and the NewCurwen, Henry
History
A History of Booksellers, the Old and the New
Curwen, Henry
Book industries and trade -- Great Britain -- History; Booksellers and bookselling -- Great Britain -- History
Scott, however, was too busy on higher paid work and was obliged to
decline the offer, and for the present Campbell went back to his
“hack-work.” Poor Campbell had suffered much from the publishers. His
“Pleasures of Hope” had been rejected by every bookseller in Glasgow
and Edinburgh; not one of them would even risk paper and printing
upon the chance of its success. At last Messrs. Mundell and Son,
printers to the University of Glasgow, with much reluctance undertook
its publication, upon the liberal condition of allowing the author
fifty copies at trade price, and, in the event of its reaching a
second edition, a gratuity of ten pounds. A few years afterwards, when
Campbell was present at a literary dinner party, he was asked to give
a toast, and without a moment’s hesitation he proposed “Bonaparte.”
Glasses were put down untouched, and shouts of “The Ogre!” resounded.
“Yes, gentlemen,” said Campbell gravely, “here is to Bonaparte; he has
just shot a bookseller!” Amid shouts of applause, for the dinner was in
“Bohemia,” the glasses were jangled and the toast was drank, for the
news had but just arrived that Palm, a bookseller of Nuremburg, had
been shot by the Emperor’s orders.
Constable scarcely thought, when he offered the fourth share of
“Marmion” to Murray, that he was fostering a dangerous rival. Yet in
the very year after the publication of “Marmion” he was projecting a
rival quarterly, and the following letter to Canning, first printed in
“Barrow’s Autobiography,” shows that Murray is entitled to the whole
credit of the new scheme.
“September 25th, 1807.
“SIR,--I venture to address you upon a subject that is perhaps
not undeserving of one moment of your attention.
“There is a work entitled the _Edinburgh Review_, written with
such unquestionable talent that it has already attained an
extent of circulation not equalled by any similar publication.
The principles of this work are, however, so radically bad,
that I have been led to consider the effect which such
sentiments, so generally diffused, are likely to produce, and
to think that some means equally popular ought to be adopted
to counteract their dangerous tendency. But the publication in
question is conducted with so much ability, and is sanctioned
and circulated with such high and decisive authority by the
party of whose opinions it is the organ, that there is little
hope of producing against it any effectual opposition, unless
it arise from you, sir, and from your friends. Should you, sir,
think the idea worthy of encouragement I should, with equal
pride and willingness, engage my arduous exertions to promote
its success; but as my object is nothing short of producing a
work of the greatest talent and importance, I shall entertain
it no longer, if it be not so fortunate as to obtain the high
patronage which I have thus, sir, taken the liberty to solicit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account