=157. Development of manufacturing organization in England; persistence
of gild restrictions elsewhere.=—In manufactures, also, there was a
movement toward freedom in the more favored countries. We shall see,
in the history of England, how greatly English manufactures, and the
commerce depending on them, advanced under the leadership of merchants
and capitalists who broke through the old gild restrictions. The
striking feature, however, in the manufactures of most countries of
this period is the maintenance of the gild system, which became a
most serious check on industrial advance. It will be remembered that
the gilds grew originally out of the union of artisans in any trade,
who banded together to protect their interests, and who were granted
certain privileges, especially that of monopoly, that they might
regulate the trade more efficiently and so protect the interests of
consumers also. At the present time the interests of consumers are
sufficiently protected by the competition of producers, who do not need
government regulations to tell them that they must sell good wares at
low prices if they desire to succeed; and just as soon as exchange
becomes sufficiently active to stimulate competition the public gains
by having restrictions abolished. In most of the European countries,
however, the gild privileges and restrictions were retained until the
nineteenth century, with results set forth in the following paragraph.
=158. Evils of the gilds.=—(1) The privilege of monopoly was abused
by limiting entrance to the gild in various ways, so that production
was restricted and prices were raised to the detriment of merchant and
consumer. Laborers suffered, also, by the lessened demand for their
services. (2) Gilds came into frequent conflict over the question as
to which had the right to exercise a particular branch of trade or
manufacture; these quarrels were similar to those arising between trade
unions at the present time. Manufacturers suffered from the separation
of allied trades; and time and money, which ought to have gone into
the business, were wasted in long lawsuits. (3) The full members of
the gilds, the masters, tried to keep the laborers (apprentices and
journeymen) in an inferior position, and granted promotion by favor
rather than by merit; laborers lost the incentive to good work and were
tempted to idleness and disorder. (4) The masters tried to preserve
equality among themselves. Any master who was sufficiently enterprising
to attempt to extend his business by introducing improvements or by
employing more men was pulled back to the general level. (5) Technical
improvements were prevented also by the regulations which were adopted
originally to secure good quality of the product, but which hardened
into a routine prescribing the details of every process of manufacture.
(6) After all the restrictions, consumers did not get good quality even
when they paid high prices. They could not punish the producers of poor
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account