=182. Decline of feudal power with the rise of mercenary armies.=—A
large part of the new revenues was spent by governments in
strengthening their military position. Feudal lords were good fighters
in the old-fashioned way, and would not give up their local power
without a struggle. They had to yield finally, however, before the
standing armies which kings called into existence towards the close
of the Middle Ages. Feudal lords loved to fight, but they were only
amateurs, after all, and did not make fighting a business. The
mercenaries, on the other hand, whom kings collected as soon as they
could afford the expense, were professionals, who submitted to a
certain amount of discipline because they could make a living by doing
so. Enterprising men collected a number of recruits, taught them to
use their arms, and drilled them until they counted for far more than
an equal number of untrained men; the leaders studied tactics and
strategy, and knew how to make the most of their superiority. The
leaders were perfectly willing to let their troops to any one who could
pay the price, but as feudal lords were always in want of ready money
the advantages of the new armies went almost entirely to the kings. The
introduction of gunpowder in warfare increased the superiority of the
mercenary armies, by adding to the value of training, and here again
the kings, with ready money to invest in the latest improvements, had
an advantage.
=183. Growth in power of the central government as shown in the
development of taxation.=—By the year 1500 the process had gone so far
that many of the states of Europe had assumed a shape substantially
like that which they have to-day; and feudalism as a great political
force was dead. Government could now proceed to develop on the basis
of an extended territory. Some measure of the gain of the central
government in power can be had by noting the increase of its resources
from taxation. English taxes yielded about half a million pounds in
the sixteenth century, seven and a half million in the next century,
and about forty million towards 1800. In little over a hundred years
the yield of taxes in Prussia increased twenty-eight fold. The revenue
system was still crude and wasteful. Every European state followed
at one time or another the practice of raising money by selling the
right to hold an office. Every European state lost money, not only
by the inefficiency of the revenue system, but also by corruption of
officials; often half or more of money that the people paid in taxes
never reached the treasury. In spite, however, of these inevitable
faults, national resources were concentrated as they had never been
before, and the central government gained a power before unknown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account