=299. The rise of Prussia important mainly from the political
standpoint.=—Taking German commerce as a whole, we leave it in 1800
still depressed and sluggish. The picture would be incomplete, however,
if nothing more were said. In one part of Germany there had been
great activity for centuries; in the North and East, namely, where
the ancestors of the present Emperor William II were building up the
state of Prussia. This activity, however, was mainly political, and
the history of it does not belong here; we can refer to it only as
a most remarkable example of state-making, in which commercial and
industrial interests were made subordinate to the establishment of a
strong government over a united people. The Hohenzollern rulers did not
succeed in making a rich state out of a group of scattered territories
of which some were, in natural resources, among the poorest in Germany.
They did make a strong state, which won for itself a place among the
great powers, and later took the lead in unifying Germany.
There was a moment in the history of the Hohenzollerns when it seemed
possible that they might anticipate the idea of William II: “Our
future lies upon the water.” If the Great Elector (1640-1688) had
secured the Pomeranian coast of the Baltic or kept even Stettin, he
might have realized the plans he held to turn Prussia into a sea
power, with fleet, colonies, and transmarine commerce. Fortune fixed
the interests of the state on land, however, and when a good Baltic
harbor was secured later it was too late to change. Frederick the Great
was urged, a century afterward, to direct his policy to the sea, and
actually founded some companies for trade with the East, but the time
had passed, or had not yet come, for the success of Prussia in oceanic
trade.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account