Thanks to the wide extent of her colonial dominions, England could
hope to gain in one part of the world if she lost in another, and the
development of the Australian colonies in this period promised to
atone for any decline in the West. The British flag was first raised
in Australia in 1788. The young colonies were out of the track of the
trade of the time, and seemed of such small importance that one was
made a penal settlement, but the natural resources, especially the
fitness for sheep-raising, induced a steady growth of population, and a
considerable trade, even before the gold discoveries in the middle of
the century.
QUESTIONS AND TOPICS
1. What do we mean when we speak of the “importance” of a country’s
commerce? The reader who reflects upon this question will find that
at least three different standards are taken to measure importance.
(1) Mere bulk or value. The commerce of the British Empire would be
called the most important in the world, because it is larger than
that of any other state. (2) The needs of the people of the country.
A considerable number of Englishmen would starve without commerce. In
this sense commerce is even more important to the miners of Alaska,
for they would practically all starve without it. (3) The needs of
other countries for the exports of a given country. In this sense the
United States has perhaps the most important commerce in the world,
because it supplies so much of the world’s need for cotton, copper,
foodstuffs, etc.
Endeavor to find examples, in this book or in others, of the different
uses of the word; apply it in different uses to different countries.
2. Treat the statistics in sect. 418 as suggested previously, by
graphic representation. How did British commerce compare in growth
with world commerce? Did England keep her share in the world’s trade?
Try to find in English history reasons for the ups and downs of trade,
and for its gains and losses in comparison with the world’s trade.
Beware, however, of hasty conclusions; many pitfalls are concealed
in commercial statistics. In the table in the text, for example, the
early figures are those of total exports and imports of merchandise,
including wares simply passing through English hands to foreign
customers; the figures for 1816 and the following years show only
exports of British produce and manufacture, and imports retained in
the country. This change in the method of measurement, rather than
the crisis following the Napoleonic wars, explains the drop in the
figures. This last method of measurement will be followed in later
tables.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account