=466. Obstacles to a customs union.=—The course of trade has, in
fact, taken lines more and more opposed to the scheme of a customs
union. During the first part of the century, when England was still
protectionist, and when the mother country made the laws for its
dependencies, the plan could be carried out with comparatively little
friction; the colonies were engaged chiefly in the production of raw
materials, and were glad to exchange these for English manufactures.
Since about 1850, however, both the political and the economic
organization of the Empire have changed. The self-governing colonies
have received the right to make their own laws, and have used it to
raise protective tariffs, against England as well as against other
countries. Behind the barriers of the tariff they have developed
a considerable manufacturing industry. They were now unwilling,
therefore, to open wide their markets to English manufacturers; and
showed an increasing tendency to buy what manufactures they did import
from other countries than England. They were unable, on the other
hand, to supply in full the English demand for raw materials; and any
measure designed to restrict supplies of raw materials to some source
inside the British Empire threatened injury to producer and consumer
at home. The self-governing colonies gave evidence of the strength of
their political affection by enacting differential tariffs favoring
the British producer. Canada began the practice in 1894, and later
enlarged the concession until it amounted to a remission of one-third
of the regular customs duty. New Zealand, South Africa and Australia
adopted after 1900 the same principle, making their concessions less
extensive. The differential advantage thus offered the English exporter
must evidently have had an effect on the course of trade. The new
policy was keenly resented in Germany, where it was pictured as an
abuse by England of her political ascendancy to deprive other countries
of the benefit that should go to superior economic efficiency. On the
other hand the policy seems to have been less important than ordinary
economic factors in determining the flow of goods, and certainly had no
decisive influence in changing the customary channels of trade.
=467. Relative progress of England and other countries just before the
World War.=—Just before the outbreak of the World War England appeared
to have made a new start in the efforts to keep her place among
commercial countries. It is interesting to compare the advance that she
had made with the progress of Germany and of the United States.
ABSOLUTE INCREASE IN TRADE OF THE ANNUAL AVERAGE 1910-13
OVER AVERAGE 1895-99.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account