A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The few μελέται of Adrianus, the successor and funeral eulogist of
Herodes Atticus, are whole declamations, not [Sidenote: _Minors._]
brought under any of the heads. The _Diegemata_ and _Ethopœiæ_ of
Severus, after what has been said of these kinds, will need no special
characterisation; and the _Progymnasmata_ of George Pachymeres (who was
nearly contemporary with Dante) and of the Anonymus are, like so many of
the others, pure examples, indeed (as the former are well called in one
MS.) _Meletæ_ on the Progymnasmata themselves.
No great resumption or amplification of the scattered comments already
made on these works can be necessary. They form a by no means
contemptible group of "Composition [Sidenote: _General remarks on the
Progymnasmata._] books," creditably distinguished from some more modern
examples of the same kind by being busy with something better than mere
grammar, but not as a rule showing any of that conception of style which
is visible as early as Dionysius, distinct in Quintilian, and present in
a form at once vigorous and exquisite in Longinus. They are by no means
ill calculated to excite an interest in literature, and even to
facilitate the production, in not contemptible form, of certain kinds of
it. But there is upon all of them the curse of beginning at the wrong
end—of constructing an elaborate skeleton system of forms, and kinds,
and sub-kinds, and then classifying literature under these, instead of
beginning with the literature, separating the good from the bad, and
examining, as far as may be possible, the sources of goodness and
badness. A man trained in them would have many advantages over our
heaven-born, but hardly even earth-instructed, reviewers and students of
literature. But he would be very apt to miss the finer touches, to lose
the nobler gusts, of literature; and he would be especially disposed
towards that worst disease of criticism, so often manifested in its
history, which leads men to ignore, or even blaspheme, great work,
because it refuses to be classified, or to obey the arbitrary rules
which have been foisted into, or encrusted upon, the classification.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account