A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Anonymus busies himself with Synecdoche only, and yet another adopts the
dictionary arrangement, as do divers others with Tropes. One of the best
pieces of the whole is the treatise of Georgius Choeroboscus, a writer
of the fourth or fifth century. It is short, and deals with only a few
figures; but these are the important ones, the definitions are mostly
clear and sensible, and the examples, though not numerous, are well
chosen.
The ninth volume opens with the not unimportant work to which reference
has been made above, the _De Interpretatione_ [Sidenote: _The Demetrian_
De Interpretatione.] of Demetrius the Uncertain. But it also contains
six other works on various divisions of Rhetoric, one of which is at
least interesting for the great name of Longinus attached to it (as some
would have it with greater certainty than in the case of the work that
we would rather wish his), and others for other matter.
Demetrius takes a somewhat independent view of his subject, which he
puts on a level with Poetics, but does not call Rhetoric. As Poetry, he
states, deals with—or at least is distinguished and divided by—metres
(this _netteté_ is refreshing, and we shall go farther to fare very
often worse), so what are called clauses[144] divide and distinguish the
interpretation of prose speech. Then, directing attention directly to
clauses, he illustrates their kinds from the respective beginnings of
the histories of Hecatæus and the _Anabasis_ of Xenophon, and prefers
(though not to the exclusion of what he does _not_ prefer) short clauses
to long. From clauses he goes to periods, discussing and analysing their
composition rather narrowly, and then returns to parallel clauses,
whence striking off to _homœoteleuta_ he continues his treatise under
a great number of similar heads, betraying the slightly heterogeneous
and higgledy-piggledy arrangement which, as we have said already, is so
apt to beset these writers on Rhetoric. But he maintains throughout a
creditable desire to identify his subject with the Art of Prose
Composition, and not merely with Persuasion, or with the composition of
an extremely artificial kind of prize essay on lines more artificial
still.
Footnote 144:
τὰ καλούμενα κώλα
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account