A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Of these, Dion Chrysostom is not merely the earliest in date, but, on
the whole, the most important to literature. He [Sidenote: _Dion
Chrysostom._] appears to have been a distinguished and rather fortunate
example of a “gentleman of the press” (as we should now say) before the
press existed. He travelled over a great part of the Roman Empire in the
pursuit of his profession as Lecturer—that perhaps comes nearest to
it—and would appear to have been well rewarded. The description of his
morning’s employment, which begins his study of the three Poets' plays
on _Philoctetes_,[147] is one of the most interesting passages in the
later and less-known classics, and so is worth giving here, though it
exists in at least one unlearned language: “I rose about the first hour
of the day, both because I was poorly, and because the air was cooler at
dawn, and more like autumn, though it was midsummer. I made my toilette,
said my prayers, and then getting into my curricle, went several times
round the Hippodrome, driving as easily and quietly as possible. Then I
took a walk, rested shortly, bathed and anointed myself, and after
eating a slight breakfast, took up some tragedies.” The careful “study
of the body,” the quiet affluence of a well-to-do professional man, and
the attention to professional work without any hurry or discomfort, are
all well touched off here; and what follows gives us, as it happens, the
closest approach to our subject proper to be found in the considerable
collection of Dion’s Orations, or, as they have been much more properly
called, Essays. There are, however, others which are more characteristic
of this division of literature, and we may deal with these first.
Footnote 147:
_Dion Chrys. Op._, ed. Reiske (Leipsic, 1784), ii. 266. M. Egger (p.
441 _sq._) has translated the whole Oration (p. 11), but by no means
literally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account