A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
I use the Tauchnitz edition, by Dindorf, 3 vols., Leipsic, 1858.
Footnote 206:
This is fairly close, I think, but the two first lines, at any rate,
are too perfect not to be quoted in their own tongue—
Λουκιανὸς τάδ´ ἔγραφε, παλαιά τε μωρά τε εἰδῶς·
μωρὰ γὰρ ἀνθρώποις καὶ τὰ δοκοῦντα σοφά,
lines which grave themselves on the memory at twenty, and at fifty are
only graven deeper.
Footnote 207:
II. 1-24.
If the “How to Write History” is chiefly concerned with matter, the
_Lexiphanes_[208] is, with at least equal thoroughness, devoted
[Sidenote: _The_ Lexiphanes.] to words. The comedy here is of a
different kind, broader, but hardly less subtle. The play on αὐχμὸς
(“dry”) and νεοχμὸς (“newfangled”), the taste which Lexiphanes gives at
once of his preciousness by the use of the word κυψελόβυστα
(“wax-stuffed”), his superb contempt for irony,[209] with his
interlocutor’s audacious punning and sham reverence, “set” the piece at
once for us. The wonderful lingo which Lexiphanes proceeds to pour forth
in his “Anti-symposium” is matter for another inquiry than this; but the
subsequent criticism of it by Lycinus and Sopolis is quite within our
competence. And there is nowhere any sounder prophylactic against one of
the recurrent diseases of literature, an access of which has been on us,
as it happens, for a considerable time past. There are other diseases,
of course—affected archaism, affected purism, &c. But this particular
one of “raising language to a higher power,” as it has been called by
some of those afflicted (and pleased) with it in our days, has never
been better characterised. “Before all things,” says Lycinus, “prythee
remember me this, not to mimic the worst inventions of modern
rhetoricians, and smack your lips over them,[210] but to trample on
them, and emulate the great classical examples. Nor let the wind-flowers
of speech bewitch you, but, after the manner of men in training, stick
to solid food. Sacrifice first of all to the Goddess Clearness and to
the Graces by whom you are quite deserted. Bid avaunt! to bombast and
magniloquence, to tricks of speech. Do not turn up your nose, and strain
your voice, and jeer at others, and think that carping at everybody else
will put yourself in the front rank. Nay, you have another fault, not
small, but perhaps your greatest, that you do not first arrange the
meaning of your expressions, and then dress them up in word and phrase;
but if you can pick up anywhere some outlandish locution, or invent one
that seems pretty to you, you try to tack a meaning on to it, and are
miserable if you cannot stuff it in somewhere, though it may have no
necessary connection with what you have to say.”[211] It would be
impossible to put more forcibly or better the necessary caution, the
Devil’s Advocate’s plea, against the abuse and exaggeration of the
doctrine of the “beautiful word.”
Footnote 208:
II. 144-152.
Footnote 209:
τὸν μὲν εἴρωνα πέδοι κατάβαλε.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account