A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
To Rhetoric, as distinguished from literary criticism proper, Lucian’s
chief (indeed his only considerable and substantive) contribution is the
so-called “Master of the Orators,”[214] [Sidenote: _Works touching
Rhetoric._] to which may be added a μελέτη or declamation on one of the
stock subjects (a case of tyrannicide) and some parts of the “Twice
Accused Man.”[215] This last is a curious _pot-pourri_ of satire on the
different schools of philosophy, on the methods of the law courts, and
on forensic eloquence. Rhetoric herself appears, besides an
impersonation of Dialogue, both in the character of public prosecutors
against “the Syrian.” Rhetoric states that he has deserted her for
Dialogue, Dialogue that he has disgraced and shamed him by burlesque.
Now Lucian, it is hardly necessary to say, was a Syrian, and had been a
professional teacher of Rhetoric himself. The piece is chiefly parody,
especially in the two speeches just mentioned, where Lucian displays
that faculty of causing his characters to make themselves ridiculous, in
which he has had no rival (except the authors of the _Satire Menippée_
and Butler), to admiration. The reasons given by the “Syrian” for
deserting Rhetoric are also very funny.
Footnote 214:
III. 1.
Footnote 215:
II. 358.
But the whole has only a partial connection with literature, and is even
more concerned with the degradation of the Rhetorical profession than
with Rhetoric herself. Incidentally, however, it shows the strong
attraction of that subject, warped and mismanaged as it was, for persons
with the literary interest in them. If Rhetoric could have seen herself
as she ought to be—even as she is in Longinus—it is pretty certain that
Lucian would not have said the hard things against her which here
appear.
The “Master of the Rhetors” or Orators is in the common form of
rhetorical treatises, the form of the Περὶ Ὕψους itself, that of an
address to a young friend. This young friend had asked how a man might
become a rhetor and a sophist, a position and title which he thought the
noblest of all. Lucian has not the least objection to tell him, so let
him listen. He shall climb the steep easily and rest on the heights,
while others are tumbling down and cracking their crowns. Let there be
no doubt about this. Poetry is a more difficult thing than rhetoric, and
did not Hesiod master it by just plucking a few leaves from Helicon? Did
not a merchant show Alexander a short cut from Persia to Egypt, only the
unbelieving Macedonian would not listen? Lucian will be that merchant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account