A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
For though he himself was almost certainly unconscious of it, and might
even have denied the fact with some warmth if it had [Sidenote:
_Modernity of the treatise,_]. been put to him, Longinus has marked out
grounds of criticism very far from those of the ancient period
generally, further still from those which were occupied by any critic
(except Dante) of the Middle Ages and the Classical revival, and close
to, if not in all cases overlapping the territory of, the modern
Romantic criticism itself. As we have seen, the ancient critic was wont
either to neglect the effect of a work of art altogether, and to judge
it by its supposed agreement with certain antecedent requirements, or
else, if effects were considered at all, to consider them from the
merely practical point of view, as in the supposed persuasive effect of
Rhetoric, or from the ethical, as in the purging, the elevating, and so
forth, assigned to Tragedy, and to Poetry generally. Longinus has
changed all this. It is the enjoyment, the transport, the carrying away
of the reader or auditor, that, whether expressedly or not, is always at
bottom the chief consideration with him. He has not lowered the ethical
standard one jot, but he has silently refused to give it precedence of
the æsthetic; he is in no way for lawlessness, but he makes it clear,
again and again, that mere compliance with law, mere fulfilment of the
requirements of the stop-watch and the hundredth-of-an-inch rule, will
not suffice. Aristotle had been forced, equally by his system and his
sense, to admit that pleasure was an end—perhaps the end—of art; but he
blenches and swerves from the consequences. Longinus faces them and
follows them out.
In his attention to rhythm, especially of prose, Longinus is much less
unique, for this point (as we have seen and shall see) was never
neglected by the best ancient critics. But there is again something
particularly distinguishing in his attempt to trace the sources of the
literary pleasure in specimen passages. The ancient tendency is, though
not universally, yet too generally, the other way, to select specimen
passages merely as illustrations of general rules.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account