A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
If we advance a little in point of time and turn our attention to the
strict teaching and practice of Rhetoric itself, from the second century
onward, and probably backward almost to the very time of Aristotle, the
spectacle is even less satisfactory. The work, of which Hermogenes and
Aphthonius are the coryphæi, leading an innumerable chorus of followers
and commentators, who continue for more than a thousand years, is not
exactly contemptible work. Work conducted with extreme diligence and
also, at any rate in some cases, with remarkable alertness and acuteness
of mind, can never be wholly contemptible. But it is work disappointing,
unsatisfying, and even irritating to the last degree. The technical
Rhetoric, always arbitrarily limited in subject and perversely
conventional in method, has practically lost all chance of exercising
itself in the noblest of its three divisions. Deliberative oratory is
dead, except in exercises and make-believes, and the bread-winning
chicanery of forensic, the frivolities (hollow except as also
bread-winning) of epideictic, have usurped the whole room. It might be
thought that in this bereaved condition the art would bethink itself of
that profitable, dignified and delightful application which it had
always more or less directly practised, but which had seemed less
dignified than Persuasion—the art of literary criticism proper. But it
does nothing—or but little—of the kind. The remarks of Hermogenes on
Frigidity are not bad; the doubtful Demetrius, in his study of
Interpretation, is not far from the true kingdom others approach it here
and there. The invention of that critical “lingo,” to which reference
has more than once been made, is something, though a something liable to
abuse, and capable of standing in the way of better things. But, on the
whole, the endless procession of some fifty generations, from the author
of the _Rhet. ad Alex._ to John of Sicily, busies itself either on the
one hand with endless distinctions, systematisations, and terminologies,
with everlastingly twining strands of new colour into the rope that lets
down the bucket into the empty well, and varying the staves and hoops of
the bucket itself; or on the other with the provision of cut-and-dried
patterns for the use of the brainless, with telling tongue-tied sophists
what they are to say at the funeral of a fifth cousin, and how to make
the most of a harbour which is dry for three-quarters of every tide.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account