A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Then, with the almost shorthand abruptness of transition which
characterises the poem, we pass to an incidental consideration of
metres. An iambic is a long syllable put after a short one, and you
arrange them in batches of six with, in certain places only, spondees
for a change. Do not take too many licences: stick to the Greek. If your
ancestors were fools enough to admire Plautus you need not. They say
Thespis invented drama, or at least tragedy. Æschylus improved it and
made it magniloquent. Then came the Old Comedy—rather too licentious, so
that it had to pull in its sails and drop its chorus. We have tried all
sorts, not without success, but the labour of the file is absolutely
necessary. The idea of poetic madness and excess is all nonsense. If I
cannot write great poetry I can teach others how to write it. Be careful
of your subject, and do not attend to tuneful trifles.
You must either instruct or delight, or both; you must not write
romantic and prodigious extravagances. Mix pleasure with profit and you
are safe. You need not be absolutely faultless, but avoid faults as much
as you can. Be careful to suit the style to the subject as much as
possible, and do not “pad.” Mediocre poetry is intolerable.
Finally, do not be in a hurry to publish; invite friendly criticism; do
not force yourself; destroy a good deal. For _nescit vox missa reverti_.
The influence of poets is mythically signified by the stories of
Orpheus, who moved beasts, and Amphion, who built Thebes by song. Homer
came next, and was famous. Tyrtæus roused men to war. Many kinds of
poetry have been discovered since, and they all need hard work to
cultivate them with success. Some remarks on recitation follow, and then
the lines on which friendly criticism should proceed are drawn, and the
piece ends rather ambiguously with a reference to the fate of
Empedocles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account