A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The positive gains, of or from the _Rhetoric_, are less, but hardly
less. It follows from the special limitations of the plan, which have
already been dealt with, that we have no special theory of prose as
such, and that, not merely some shortcomings, but some positive and
mischievous delusions (such as the confusion of style with delivery),
result from it. But, in divers casual animadversions, he shows us that
if by good fortune he had given us _Prosaics_, the book would, though it
were not more faultless than the _Poetics_, have been quite as valuable.
And as it is, these things supply us with invaluable hints, glimpses,
_points de repère_. The first, and not the least valuable, is the
distinction, used also in the _Poetics_, but there only casually and in
a glance, of words as κύρια and ξένα. Purity, “Amplification,”
Propriety, while they at least suggest those dangers of misapprehended
terminology which have been already dealt with, supply Criticism with
those appropriate classifications, and that necessary plant, without
which no art can exist. And the importance of the rhythm-section cannot
be exaggerated.
Indeed I have sometimes thought that, without extreme arbitrariness or
fancifulness, even the _Pistis_ part of the Rhetoric may be made
subservient to pure criticism. It is not so very far from the effect of
persuading or convincing the hearer to that of producing on the reader
the required effect—it may be of persuasion and conviction, it may be of
information, or it may be simply of that subduing and charming which is
the end and aim of the prose artist as such, whether his name be Burke
or Scott, Browne or Arnold, and whether his nominal division of
literature be history or fiction, criticism or philosophy, things human
or things divine. The “Colours of Good and Evil,” the tendencies of the
readers, the fashions of the day and the passions of all days—these are
things which beyond all dispute will very mightily affect the
appreciation of a book, and which, it may be argued not quite
improperly, condition, in no small degree likewise, its attainment of
its object, its administration of its own pleasure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account