A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
At least three epigrams of a different sort rather make us regret that
there are not more of the same kind, instead of the iteration of stock
phrases. The first,[114] by Herodicus of Babylon, is a smart onslaught
on the “fry of Aristarchus,” the “mono-syllabists” who care for nothing
but ΣΦΙΝ and ΣΦΩιΝ and ΜΙΝ and ΝΙΝ. The second,[115] by Antiphanes,
hails the “busybody race” of grammarians who “dig up the roots of other
people’s muses,” with a great many more abusive but not quite
inappropriate epithets and comparisons. The third,[116] by Philippus, is
perhaps the best of the three, girding at the “whelps of Zenodotus” with
a kind of combination of the other two, which is very likely actual and
intentional. Philip (_v. infra_) was a careful student of the elders of
his craft. Antipater of Thessalonica[117] has quite a group of literary
epigrams. He celebrates the Nine Poetesses, takes part in the
Antimachus-Homer debate, refusing the Colophonian primacy, but granting
him second rank and the praise of rough vigour (“the Hammer on the anvil
of the Pierides”), &c., and honours Aristophanes. Homer once more
occupies Alpheus of Mitylene[118] and Antiphilus of Byzantium,[119]
while Philippus of Thessalonica[120] devotes a “pretty but slim”
comparison with flowers to the principal bards of the Anthology itself.
Footnote 112:
ii. 3.
Footnote 113:
ii. 18, _sq._
Footnote 114:
ii. 64.
Footnote 115:
ii. 189.
Footnote 116:
ii. 207.
Footnote 117:
ii. 101, 102.
Footnote 118:
ii. 116.
Footnote 119:
ii. 157.
Footnote 120:
ii. 194.
This same Philippus has also a not unhappy conceit[121] about Hipponax
bidding the usual passer-by at his tomb “not wake the sleeping wasp,
Whose shafts fly straight although his metres limp.” A pale addition to
the garland of Sophocles comes from the doubtless alien hand of
Stratyllius Flaccus,[122] and Hesiod supplies only a play on words to
the better artistry of Marcus Argentarius,[123] while the accident of
our order of reading—a genuine accident—finishes a volume, and the tale,
with the marvellously lame and only epigram of a certain Pinytus[124] on
no less a person than Sappho.
Footnote 121:
ii. 219.
Footnote 122:
ii. 240.
Footnote 123:
ii. 244.
Footnote 124:
ii. 264.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account