A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Harington, a person of humour, and a typical Englishman, perstringes
this as well as other things in his fling at the _Art_.
-----
The second book deals with Proportion, in which word Puttenham includes
almost everything belonging to Prosody in its widest sense—staff,
stanza, measure, metres, and feet, “cæsure,” rhyme, accent, cadence,
situation (by which he means the arrangement of the rhymes), and
proportion in figure. [Sidenote: _Systematic arrangement_] On most of
these heads he speaks more or less in accordance with his fellows
(though he very noticeably abstains from extreme commendation or
condemnation of rhyme), save that, for the moment, he seems to neglect
the “new versifying.” It is, however, but for a moment. After his
chapters on “proportion” in figure (the fanciful egg, wheel, lozenge,
&c., which he himself argues for, and which were to make critics of the
Addisonian type half-angry and half-sad), he deals with the subject.
About this “new versifying” he is evidently in two minds. He had glanced
at it before (and refers to the glance now)[256] as “a nice and
scholastic curiosity.” However, “for the information of our young
makers, and pleasure to those who be delighted in novelty, _and to the
intent that we may not seem by ignorance or oversight to omit_,”[257] he
“will now deal with it.” Which he does at great length; and, at any rate
sometimes, with a clearer perception of the prosodic values than any
other, even Spenser, had yet shown. But he does not seem quite at home
in the matter, and glides off to a discussion of feet—classical feet—in
the usual rhymed English verse.
-----
Footnote 256:
Here as elsewhere we may note evidences of possible revision in the
book. That there was some such revision is certain; for instance, Ben
Jonson’s copy (the existence of which is not uninteresting) contains a
large cancel of four leaves, not found in other copies known. For this
and other points of the same kind, see Mr Arber’s edition.
Footnote 257:
“Reviewing” was as yet in its infancy—a curiously lively one though,
with Nash and others coming on. Puttenham seems to have understood its
little ways rather well.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account