A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
fallen,[386] is one of the great epoch-making sentences of criticism. Of
course it was not attended to; but for a hundred years and more French
literature bore ever-increasing testimony to its truth.
-----
Footnote 385:
P. 125 _ed. cit._
Footnote 386:
“L’excès choquant de Ronsard nous a un peu jetés dans l’extrémité
opposée; on a appauvri, desséché et gâté notre langue.” And he
proceeds, with much humour and more truth, to stigmatise the prim
following of grammar, the “substantive hand in hand with its
adjective,” the verb “walking behind with an adverb at its heels, and
an accusative in a place unalterable.” “C’est ce,” this great _locus_
continues, “qui exclut toute suspension d’esprit, toute surprise,
toute variété, et souvent toute magnifique cadence.” 1830 could say no
more; and often said it with less authority.
-----
The censure of French drama is injured, partly by certain prejudices of
the moralist and the theologian, and partly by less accountable
crotchets. On Molière in particular, though he cannot help admiring the
greatest of his contemporary countrymen, he is something from which we
had best turn our faces, putting likewise into the wallet at our backs
(and Time’s) the complaints of _la basse plaisanterie de Plaute_, and
the statement that _on se passe volontiers d’Aristophane_. The point is
the quantity of opinion which is not for Oblivion’s alms-bag. And,
abundant as this is in Fénelon, the quality of it is more remarkable
even than the quantity. He always prefers the study of author, and book,
and piece, and phrase, to the study of Kind and the manufacture of Rule.
Though he is in no sense an Anarchist, and may even have sometimes his
cloth rather too much in his remembrance, yet he remembers likewise, and
transfers to profane things, the sacred precept, “Prove all things: hold
fast that which is good.” The fatal fault of the extremest kind of
neo-classic criticism—the weak point in all of it—is the usual refusal
to “prove” the work, even to see whether it is good or not, if it fails
to answer at first blush to certain arbitrary specifications. Fénelon is
free from this: he has escaped from the House of Bondage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account