A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Of three things, however, the one is absolutely incontestable as a fact,
and the other two are not easily, I think, to be gainsaid by competent
authority. [Sidenote: _Importance of the_ Poetics.] The first is, that
Vida anticipates in time even the earliest of the prose critics of the
new Italian school by some couple of years, while he anticipates the
main group of these critics by more than twenty. The second is, that
though no doubt he took some impulse from Politian and other Humanists,
he is practically the first to codify that extravagant Virgil-worship
which reigned throughout the Neo-Classical dispensation. The third is
that, not merely in this point but in others, he seems, by a sort of
intuition, to have anticipated, at the beginning of the sixteenth
century, almost the whole critical orthodoxy of the sixteenth,
seventeenth, and eighteenth. It is this which makes the translation of
him by Pitt so interesting; because the translator is, for once, no
traitor, but _plus royaliste que le roi_—fanatically imbued with the
principles, and equipped to the finger-tips with the practice, of his
original. But for the purposes of the scholar that original itself must
of course be taken.
The temper and the faith in which Vida writes are made manifest by the
very beginning of his poem—an invocation to the Muses woven of
unexceptionable _gradus_-tags, and deftly dovetailed into a dedication
to the luckless Dauphin Francis, who had then taken his father’s place
as Charles the Fifth’s prisoner at Madrid, and to whose captivity the
poem is modestly offered as a solace or pastime. [Sidenote: _Analysis of
the piece._] These invocations accomplished _more majorum_, Vida
proceeds to occupy his First Book with a sort of general clearing of the
ground. He is ready to teach the secret of all kinds of poetry; but the
poet must very carefully inquire what are the kinds to which he himself
is best adapted and best inclined. Commissioned work is dubious, unless
under a king’s command. But there is more than this: the poetic child
must be carefully nursed in the arts suitable to his great calling. He
must be as carefully guarded from the taint of vulgar and incorrect
speech; and must be regularly initiated into Poetry—Latin first,
especially Virgil, and then Greek, especially Homer. A short historical
sketch of poetry follows; but it, like everything else, is brought round
to the deification of the Mantuan. Hence Vida (who must be pronounced
rather long in weighing anchor) diverges to a good-natured intercession
with parents and teachers not to have the boys whipped too much, telling
a moving legend of an extremely pretty[37] boy who was actually whipped
to death, or at least died of fear. Emulation, however, is quite a good
stimulus; and by degrees work will be loved for itself. But original
poetical production must not be attempted too young; there must be time
for play; the rudiments of metre and so forth must be thoroughly learnt;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account