A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Antonio Sebastiano, called Minturno (which is stated—I know not with
what correctness—in a MS. note in my copy of the _Arte Poetica_ to be
merely an “academic” surname), is a good example of that combination of
scholastic thoroughness and diligence with wider range of study which
honourably distinguishes the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries,
but which, save in rare instances, went out in the later years of the
last-named age, and has too seldom been recovered since. [Sidenote:
_Minturno._] In 1559 he produced a _De Poeta_ and in 1563 an _Arte
Poetica_, one of which, as the respective titles imply, is written in
Latin and the other in Italian, but which are by no means replicas of
each other with the language changed. Both were printed at Venice; and
though they came from different presses, they range very well together,
both being in a smallish quarto, but with very close type, so that the
560 odd pages of the _De Poeta_ and the 450 odd of the _Arte_ contain
between them a vast amount of matter. The plans of the two
treatises—which are allotted naturally according to their language, the
Latin to poetry in general and to classical verse, the Italian to its
own kind—are not strikingly but slightly different. The _De Poeta_,
which is addressed to Ettore Pignatelli, Duke of Bivona, takes the
time-honoured form of a symposium or dialogue, the persons being the
poet Sannazar (who is always introduced by his Latin names of Actius
Syncerus) and his friends, and the scene the famous Villa Mergellina.
Indeed, Minturno seems to have written the book at Naples, whence he
dates it a year before that of its appearance. In the later work he
himself is the principal speaker, his antagonists or interlocutors being
Vespasiano Gonzaga in the First book, Angelo Costanzo in the Second,
Bernardino Rota in the Third, and Ferrante Carafa in the Fourth. The
dialogue-form, it may also be mentioned, is less, and that of the formal
treatise more, prominent in the _Arte_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account