A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
It is the presence of this contrast, or combination, in him which, as
much as anything else, has determined more attention in this place to
Minturno than to some other authors before noticed. [Sidenote: _Their
value._] In combination of thoroughness and range he seems to me to hold
a position both high and rather solitary. He has not quite the elaborate
system of Scaliger, but then he is much less one-eyed; he is less
original—has less _diable au corps_—than Castelvetro, but he is far less
eccentric and incalculable. His unfeigned belief in the noble and
general theories of poetry and the poet is set off by his sedulous
attention to particulars, as his attention to particulars is by his
escapes of relief into the region of generalisation, and by his
all-important addition of “transport” to “teach” and “delight.” He has
not reached—he has in fact declined—the historical antinomianism of
Patrizzi (_v._ next chap.); but that was inevitable, since this view was
in part a reaction from the movement which he represented, in part a
development of theories contemporary with himself. And his attitude in
regard to the _Romanzi_ is a significant sign of the turn of the tide.
Earlier, and in the neo-classics _quand même_ later, the fact that a
thing differs in kind from the accepted forms of poetry is proof that it
is not poetry at all. Minturno cannot go this length. It is poetry
inferior in kind, he still insists; but the excellence of those who have
adopted it saves it, no matter to what extent. The concession is fatal.
If Balbus builds a wall contrary to the laws of nature and architecture,
it will not be an inferior wall; it will tumble down, and not be a wall
at all. If he works a sum on the principle that two and two make five,
his answer will be hopelessly wrong. But if the wall stands, if the sum
comes right, the laws, the principles, cannot be wrong, though they may
be different from others. The infallible and exclusive Kind-rules of the
ancients are doomed to be swept away through the little gap in the dam
that Minturno has opened.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account