A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Scaliger was very much better qualified than Boileau to be _législateur
du Parnasse_ in the sense in which both understood Parnassus: or perhaps
it would be better to say that without a Scaliger a Boileau would have
been impossible. [Sidenote: _The_ Poetic.] He had immense learning; he
had absolute confidence in his own judgment; and within limits which, if
they reduce his positive value, make him an even more complete and
direct exponent of his own particular school and creed, he had great
acuteness, an orderly and logical spirit, and a thorough command of
method. Nothing (certain inevitable postulates being granted) can be
more luminous and intelligible than the book, in which the author,
through all his thousand pages, never loses sight, nor permits his
reader to lose sight, of the subject, the process, and the goal. That he
stands forth in the preface to his son Sylvius with an air of patronage
at once paternal and pedagogic, announcing himself as the pioneer of the
subject, dismissing those who allege Varro, as with levity ignoring the
fact that neither Varro nor anybody else in antiquity did, or could do,
anything of the kind: that he blandly sweeps away the _plebs
grammaticorum_; that he labels the _Ars Poetica_ itself as teaching
_adeo sine ulla arte ut saturæ propius esse videatur_, Aristotle as
fragmentary, Vida as _optimus poeta in theatro, claudus magister in
schola_—is all of it agreeably Scaligerian in manner. But it is far from
being untrue in fact. And there is a touch of sublimity in the _Quare
porro opera danda est nobis_, “wherefore _we_ must put our shoulders to
the wheel,” with which he concludes. “Let others grub money, or canvass
for office, or talk about the wars as parasite guests at dinner: we will
let them alone, and simply defend the nobility of our studies, the
magnanimity and simplicity of our purpose.” After this magnificent pose
and draping, and before commendatory verses (the main copy being by no
less a person than Etienne de La Boétie) comes a table of contents of
antique clearness and solidity, filling nearly a dozen pages, by means
of which, and of the more than sixty of index at the end, the study of
the text is not a little facilitated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account