A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
ITS CAUSE—HIS INCONSISTENCY—HIS CRITICISM ON MADAME DE STAËL—ITS
LESSON—HALLAM—HIS ACHIEVEMENT—ITS MERITS AND DEFECTS—IN GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION AND TREATMENT—IN SOME PARTICULAR INSTANCES—HIS CENTRAL
WEAKNESS, AND THE VALUE LEFT BY IT.
[Sidenote: _Wordsworth and Coleridge._]
There are many differences, real and imaginary, partial and general,
parallel and cross, between ancient, and mediæval, and modern poetry;
but there is one, very striking, of a kind which specially
differentiates ancient and mediæval (except Dante) from modern. In the
former class of poets the “critic whom every poet must contain” was
almost entirely silent, or conveyed his criticism through his verse
only. It would have been of the very first interest to have an Essay
from the hand of Euripides justifying his decadent and sentimental
fashion of drama, or from that of Lucretius on the theory and practice
of didactic verse: but the lips of neither were unsealed in this
direction. Dante, on the other hand, as we have seen, was prepared and
ready to put the rationale of his own verse, his own beliefs about
poetry, into prose: so at the Renaissance were the poets of Italy and
France; so was Dryden, so was Pope.
In no instance, however, save perhaps that of the Pléiade and Du
Bellay’s _Défense et Illustration_, did a protagonist of the new poetry
take the field in prose so early and so aggressively as did Wordsworth
in his Preface to the second edition of _Lyrical Ballads_. In none,
without exception, was such an attack so searchingly criticised and so
powerfully seconded, with corrections of its mistakes, as in the case of
the well-known chapters of the _Biographia Literaria_ in which Coleridge
examined Wordsworth’s examination. These, it is true, came later in
time, but when the campaign, whereof the first sword had been drawn in
the _Lyrical Ballads_, and the first horn blown in the Preface of their
second edition, though far gone was not finished, when the final blows,
by the hands of Keats and Shelley, had still to be struck.
[Sidenote: _The former’s Prefaces._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account