A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
It is perhaps an anti-climax, though a very Coleridgean one, when he
proceeds to criticise (very justly) Wordsworth’s criticism of Gray, and
some passages both of his own and others: but we can have no quarrel
with him when he ends the chapter, too verbosely indeed, but
unanswerably, with the following conclusion of the whole matter: “When a
poem, or part of a poem, shall be adduced, which is evidently vicious in
the figures and contexture of its style, yet for the condemnation of
which no reason can be assigned, except that it differs from the style
in which men actually converse,—then and not till then can I hold this
theory to be either plausible or practicable, or capable of furnishing
either such guidance, or precaution, that might not, more easily and
more safely, as well as more naturally, have been deduced in the
author’s own mind from considerations of grammar, logic, and the truth
and nature of things, confirmed by the authority of works whose fame is
not of one country and of one age.”
[Sidenote: _The_ Argumentum ad Gulielmum.]
He has now (chaps. xix., xx.) argued himself into more confidence than
he had shown earlier, and seems disposed to retract his concession that
W. W.'s limitations were _not_ intended to apply to all poetry. He sees,
indeed, from the criticism on Gray, and from Wordsworth’s references to
Milton, that this concession was excessive, but still he thinks the
general notion too monstrous for Wordsworth to have held. And he
swerves, once more, to point out the especial beauty of beautiful
diction and beautiful metre _added_ to fine or just thought, and
introduces interesting but rather superfluous examples of this from all
manner of poets down to Wordsworth himself. These last lead him to the
very just conclusion, “Were there excluded from Mr W.'s poetic
compositions all that a literal adherence to the theory of his Preface
would exclude, two-thirds at least of the marked beauties of his poetry
must be erased.”[361] Which indeed is once more a conclusion of the
whole matter.[362]
[Sidenote: _The study of his poetry._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account