A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The _Lectures on the Age of Elizabeth_ (which succeeded the _Comic
Writers_, as these had succeeded the _Poets_) maintain, if they do not
even raise, the standard. Perhaps there is nothing so fine as the
Coleridge passage in individual and concentrated expression; nor any
piece of connected criticism so masterly as the chapter on the Novel.
But the level is higher: and nowhere do we find better expression of
that _gusto_—that amorous quest of literary beauty and rapturous
enjoyment of it—which, has been noted as Hazlitt’s great merit. His
faults are here, as always, with him and with us. Even the faithful Lamb
was driven to expostulate[488] with the wanton and, as it happens, most
uncritical belittlement of Sidney,[489] and (though he himself was
probably less influenced by political partisanship or political feeling
of any kind than almost any great writer of whom we know) to assign this
to its true cause. It is odd[490] that a critic, and a great critic,
should contrive to be inadequate both on Browne and on Dryden: and again
one cannot but suspect the combination to be due to the fact that both
were Royalists. But the King’s Head does not always come in: and it is
only fair to Hazlitt to say that he is less biassed than Coleridge by
the royalism itself of Beaumont and Fletcher, and the supposed
republicanism of Massinger. And in by far the greater part of the book—
nearly the whole of that part of it which deals with the dramatists—
there is no disturbance of this kind. The opening, if somewhat
discursive, is masterly, and with very few exceptions the lecturer or
essayist carries out the admirable motto—in fact and in deed the motto
of all real critics—“I have endeavoured to feel what was good, and to
give a reason for the faith that was in me when necessary and when in my
power.”[491] Two of his sentences, in dealing with Beaumont and
Fletcher, not merely set the key-note of all good criticism but should
open the stop thereof in all fit readers. “It is something worth living
for to write or even read such poetry as this, or to know that it has
been written.” Again, “And so it is something, as our poets themselves
wrote, ‘far above singing.’”[492]
[Sidenote: Characters of Shakespeare.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account