A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The temperament of Victor Hugo[610] was perhaps as uncritical a one as
any man ever possessed, or as ever possessed any man: but the strength
of his genius was such that it could hardly fail to confer mastery, at
any rate for a time, on its various literary applications. When the sins
of temperament had become besetting and habitual, and the genius was—in
this respect, not others—a little failed, his criticism became scarcely
more than a curiosity; when the genius was still in its prime, and the
temperament had not broken through all control, it is sometimes of a
very notable character. _William Shakespeare_[611] is the best text-book
of the later and worse state; the _Prefaces_ to the _Cromwell_,[612] to
the _Orientales_,[613] and the _Littérature et Philosophie Mêlées_[614]
of the earlier and better. To take the worst first, though there are
fine things in the _Shakespeare_ book,—there could not fail to be,
seeing that it was written, _en regardant l’océan_, by Victor Hugo,—and
though a sort of _aura_ of the right Romantic fury still breathes
through it, it has nothing of criticism except a splendid concionatory
harangue to admiration of the best things, and a great deal of Hugonism
nearly at its worst. The colossal confidence in ignorance, which made
the poet a laughing-stock to his enemies, permits him to observe (in
arguing that England never knew her Shakespeare till Voltaire taught her
better) that Dryden _parla de S. une fois pour le déclarer hors
d’usage_. [Sidenote: William Shakespeare.] It would be a good
examination question, “Translate into the French of Hugo ‘the largest
and most universal soul,’ &c.,” and the dictionary resulting would be
quite a useful cipher-code. Elsewhere you have the usual page-long
strings of names, the usual staccato sentences, punctuated with _nons_
and _ouis_, and stripped of articles and particles, the usual abuse of
England (whose life for one thing that she did, in giving Victor Hugo
refuge, he will yet not wholly take), and also the usual bursts of
verbal and imaginative inspiration which give us the _petite fièvre
cérébrale_, and make us excuse, forget, welcome any nonsense, any bad
taste, even any bad blood.
[Sidenote: Littérature et Philosophie.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account