A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
the whole position to the anti-Aristotelians after a fashion which, if
one of the king’s own generals had imitated it in actual war, would have
“broken” him for life, if it had not put him against a wall, and
opposite to a file of grenadiers. He thinks that Epictetus and Marcus
Aurelius wrote in Latin; that Toland wrote the _Leviathan_; that Marot,
Rabelais, and Montaigne wrote a jargon at least as bad as any German—
“gross and destitute of grace.” In the most celebrated passage[94]—
perhaps the only one generally known—he not only out-Voltaires Voltaire
by speaking of the “abominable pieces of Shakespeare,” those absurd
“farces worthy of Canadian savages,” but stigmatises _Goetz von
Berlichingen_ as a “detestable imitation” of them. He hardly knows of
any other German writers, and of those whom he praises Gellert and
Gessner are the only ones who have retained the least reputation. If for
one thing that he did—the injunction to write in German and not take
refuge in other languages—one is tempted to spare him, the merit almost
disappears when one remembers that he meant the German to be written in
the teeth of the natural bent of the language. The bulk of his positive
directions has nothing to do with literature whatsoever, but with the
teaching of physical science, of law, &c. And the real apex of the
_comisches Meisterstück_ (for Herder’s words are too good not to be
repeated) is to be found at the end. He prophesies, and (such is the
unending and unfathomable irony of Fate!) he prophesies quite truly,
that “the palmy days of our Literature have not come, but they are
approaching,” that he is their harbinger, that they are just about to
appear, “that though he shall not see them, his age making it hopeless,
he, like Moses, sees the Promised Land, but must not enter it.” The
inevitable jests at Moses himself, and the bare “rocks of sterile
Idumea,” follow. But it was Moses who laughed last. Every word of
Frederic’s prophecy came true; but it was because Germany neglected
every item of Frederic’s prescription. The palmy days did come: they
lasted for fifty glorious years and (with Heine) longer. But their light
was the light borrowed from the abominable Shakespeare, and their leader
was the author of _Goetz von Berlichingen_.[95]
CHAPTER III.
THE ENGLISH PRECURSORS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account