A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Neither will his titles be sought by any one in his _Lectures on the
Prophecies_: while even that edition of Cowley’s _Selected Works_ the
principle of which Johnson[137] at one time attacked, while at another
he admitted it to more favour, can only be drawn on as a proof that Hurd
was superior to mere “correctness” in harking back to this poet. Nay,
the _Moral and Political Dialogues_ (which drew from the same
redoubtable judge[138] the remark, “I fear he is a Whig still in his
heart”), though very well written and interesting in their probable
effect on Lander, are not in the main literary. Literary characters—
Waller, Cowley, and others—often figure in them, but only the third, “On
the Age of Queen Elizabeth,” has something of a literary bent, and this
itself would scarcely be noteworthy but for its practically independent
appendix, the _Letters on Chivalry and Romance_. Here—not exactly in a
nutshell, but in less than one hundred and fifty small pages—lie all
Hurd’s “proofs,” his claims, his titles: and they seem, to me at least,
to be very considerable. It is true that even here we must make some
deductions. [Sidenote: _The_ Letters on Chivalry and Romance.] The
passages about Chivalry and about the Crusades not merely suffer from
necessarily insufficient information, but are exposed to the diabolical
arrows of that great _advocatus diaboli_ Johnson when he said[139] that
Hurd was “one of a set of men who account for everything systematically.
For instance, it has been a fashion to wear scarlet breeches; these men
would tell you that according to causes and effects no other wear could
at the time have been chosen.” This is a most destructive shrapnel to
the whole eighteenth century, and by no means to the eighteenth century
only; but it is fair to remember that Hurd’s Romance was almost as
distasteful to Johnson as his Whiggery. And now there is no need for any
further application of the refiner’s fire and the fuller’s soap; while
on the other hand what remains of the _Letters_ (and it is much) is of
altogether astonishing quality. I know nothing like it outside England,
even in Germany, at its own time; I know nothing like it in England for
more than thirty years after its date; I should be puzzled to pick out
anything superior to the best of it (with the proper time allowance)
since.
[Sidenote: _Their doctrine._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account