A History of England, Period I. Mediæval MonarchyBright, J. Franck (James Franck)
History
A History of England, Period I. Mediæval Monarchy
Bright, J. Franck (James Franck)
Great Britain -- History
_Archbishops._ | _Chief-Justices._ | _Chancellors._
| |
Stigand, | Odo of Bayeux, and William | Herfast, afterwards Bishop
1052-1070. | Fitz-Osbern, 1067. | of Elmham, 1068.
Lanfranc, | William de Warenne, and | Osbern, afterwards Bishop
1070-1089. | Richard Fitz-Gilbert, | of Exeter, 1070.
| 1073. | Osmund, afterwards Bishop
| Lanfranc, Geoffrey of | of Salisbury, 1074.
| Coutances, and Robert, | Maurice, afterwards Bishop
| Count of Mortain, 1078. | of London, 1078.
| | William de Beaufeu, Bishop
| | of Thetford, 1083.
| | William Giffard, 1086.
[Sidenote: Intended resistance of the English.]
[Sidenote: Election of Eadgar.]
The death of Harold left England without a king. As yet, although
William had expected the immediate submission of the whole country,
no such course was thought of. The idea which occupied men’s minds
was the election of a new king, who might continue the defence
of the country. The two sons of Ælfgar, the great northern Earls
Edwin and Morkere, whose jealousy of Harold had been one of the
chief causes of his disaster, found themselves, now that the House
of Godwine was practically destroyed, the most prominent leaders
of the English. They came to London, and there, collecting about
them such nobles and important people as they could readily find,
they held an assembly which in some sort represented the Witan.
They probably expected that the crown would be given to one of
themselves, and that the hour for the triumph of the Mercian house
had arrived. They were disappointed in their hopes. Of properly
qualified candidates there were none, but the Southern Witan
preferred to place the crown upon the head of the grandson of
Ironside, the heir of the old royal house, and elected the Ætheling
Eadgar, young though he was.[5] It does not seem however that he
was actually crowned, that ceremony being postponed till the feast
of Christmas.
After the slaughters of the late battles, the means of resistance
in the Southern counties must have been much diminished, and
when Edwin and Morkere completed their treasonable conduct by
again withdrawing their troops, and, though they had accepted the
election, refused to give practical support to the defence of
Wessex, immediate opposition to the Conqueror became hopeless. No
further combined action was possible and no other great battle was
fought.
[Sidenote: William’s march to London.]
[Sidenote: Receives the crown at Berkhampstead.]
[Sidenote: Coronation of William.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account