A history of English literature : $b A practical text-bookAlbert, Edward
History
A history of English literature : $b A practical text-book
Albert, Edward
English literature -- History and criticism
(2) Fair Daffodils, we weep to see
You haste away so soon:
As yet the early-rising Sun
Has not attain’d his noon.
Stay, stay,
Until the hasting day
Has run
But to the even-song;
And, having pray’d together, we
Will go with you along.
We have short time to stay, as you,
We have as short a Spring;
As quick a growth to meet decay
As you, or any thing.
We die,
As your hours do, and dry
Away
Like to the Summer’s rain;
Or as the pearls of morning’s dew
Ne’er to be found again.
_To Daffodils_, HERRICK (1591–1674)
2. Write a brief criticism of the following passage of Dryden’s prose.
Comment upon (_a_) the vocabulary, (_b_) the type of sentence, (_c_)
any colloquialisms or slips of grammar, and (_d_) its value as literary
criticism.
He must have been a man of a most wonderful comprehensive
nature, because, as it has been truly observed of him, he has
taken into the compass of his _Canterbury Tales_ the various
manners and humours (as we now call them) of the whole English
nation, in his age. Not a single character has escaped him. All
his pilgrims are severally distinguished from each other; and
not only in their inclinations, but in their very physiognomies
and persons. Baptista Porta could not have described their
natures better, than by the marks which the poet gives them.
The matter and manner of their tales, and of their telling, are
so suited to their different educations, humours, and callings,
that each of them would be improper in any other mouth. Even
the grave and serious characters are distinguished by their
several sorts of gravity: their discourses are such as belong
to their age, their calling, and their breeding; such as are
becoming of them, and of them only. Some of his persons are
vicious, and some virtuous; some are unlearned, or (as Chaucer
calls them) lewd, and some are learned. Even the ribaldry of
the low characters is different; the Reeve, the Miller, and
the Cook, are several men, and distinguished from each other
as much as the mincing Lady Prioress, and the broad-speaking,
gap-toothed Wife of Bath. But enough of this; there is such a
variety of game springing up before me, that I am distracted in
my choice, and know not which to follow. ’Tis sufficient to say,
according to the proverb, that “Here is God’s plenty.” We have
our forefathers and great-granddames all before us, as they were
in Chaucer’s days; their general characters are still remaining
in mankind, and even in England, though they are called by other
names than those of monks and friars, and canons, and lady
abbesses, and nuns; for mankind is ever the same, and nothing
lost out of Nature, though everything is altered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account