A history of English literature : $b A practical text-bookAlbert, Edward
History
A history of English literature : $b A practical text-book
Albert, Edward
English literature -- History and criticism
Translations now came apace. None of them, however, was much
improvement upon Tyndale’s. In 1537 appeared the finely printed version
of “Thomas Matthew,” who was said to be =John Rogers=, a friend of
Coverdale. The _Great Bible_, the first of the authorized versions,
was executed by a commission of translators, working under the command
of Henry VIII. It was based on Matthew’s Bible. Another notable
translation was the Calvinistic _Geneva Bible_ (1560). This book
received the popular name of “_Breeches Bible_,” owing to its rendering
of Genesis iii, 7: “They sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves
breeches.” In the reign of Elizabeth was issued the _Bishops’ Bible_
(1568), a magnificent folio, which was translated by a committee of
bishops and learned men. It was intended to be a counterblast to the
growing popularity of the Breeches Bible.
With these we are close upon the great _Authorized Version_ (1611),
which we shall mention in the next chapter, where also we shall briefly
discuss the influence and the literary qualities of this translation. A
few representative passages from the early translations will be found
in the exercises attached to this chapter.
=3. The Drama.= As we have arrived on the threshold of the great
Elizabethan drama, it is here convenient to sketch the growth of the
dramatic form of literature.
(_a_) THE ORIGINS. (1) _Classical._ By the fourth or fifth century the
Latin drama had become degraded almost past recognition. It left the
merest traces in the _mimes_, who were professional strolling players
common to all Europe during the Dark Ages. Their performances seem
to have been poor and ribald enough, and they left little trace upon
English drama.
(2) _Popular Elements._ At the great festivities, such as those at
Easter and Yule, there were popular shows that included a large amount
of acting and speaking. These plays, rude and childish probably,
were survivals of ancient pagan beliefs and contained many scraps of
folk-lore. There were nature-myths, such as that representing the
expulsion of winter, in which a figure representing summer was slain
and then revived. In England these _mummings_, as they were called,
developed into elaborate sword-play, into morris-dancing (partly of
foreign origin), and into dramatic versions of the feats of Robin Hood
and St. George. These plays, which were commonly acted at the feast
of Corpus Christi, were the occasion of fun and license, particularly
at the election of the “Abbot of Unreason,” with his attendants, the
hobby-horse and the clown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account