A History of Epidemic Pestilences: From the Earliest Ages, 1495 Years Before the Birth of our Saviour to 1848: With Researches into Their Nature, Causes, and ProphylaxisBascome, Edward
History
A History of Epidemic Pestilences: From the Earliest Ages, 1495 Years Before the Birth of our Saviour to 1848: With Researches into Their Nature, Causes, and Prophylaxis
Bascome, Edward
Epidemics -- History
the mud together is insufferably offensive. At certain periods of the
year the plague preys upon the inhabitants, first appearing amongst the
lowest orders of the people, who are mostly in a wretched condition:
its progress is stopped only when the Nile, by overflowing, washes away
this load of filth; the cold winds, which set in at the same time,
purifying the air. The plague in Constantinople is generally observed
to break out in that part of the city which is low and marshy.
On searching the ancient records of medicine, and on referring to
history, both sacred and profane, nothing in the shape of evidence can
be found, previously to the time of Hippocrates, to show that epidemic
pestilences were thought to be contagious; in fact, all writers before
the Arabians invariably speak of epidemic diseases as arising from
places, seasons, and constitutions of the air; and nowhere in his
works does the great parent of medicine, the erudite and all-observant
Hippocrates, entertain the idea of contagion:--Δεῖ δὲ καταμανθάνειν τὴν
Κατάστασιν τῶν ‘Ωρέων ἀκριβῶς, καὶ τῶν Νούσων ἑκάστην.
I would ask of all unprejudiced persons, What could contagion have had
to do with the terrific and wide-spreading outbreak of pestilence at
Kurrachee (see ‘History of Pestilences,’ p. 177), where 8000 victims
were at once seized and carried off in a few days?
But that which I would urge in support of the
NON-CONTAGIOUSNESS of epidemic pestilences, irrespective
of EVERY other authority, is the remarkable fact, that in
our most ancient medical treatise, the 13th chapter of Leviticus,
no mention whatever is made of epidemic diseases being reckoned
contagious, although at the time when the Levitical code was being
propounded there was no lack of experience in epidemic diseases;
for in the days of Moses the times in Egypt were calamitous
indeed:--pestilence and famine ran riot through the land. Had epidemic
diseases, then so common and lethal in Egypt, been considered
contagious, the presumption is that they would have been enumerated as
such among those which were specified as possessing that character,
viz. leprosy, scabies, lues, &c.; and when we observe such minuteness
displayed in the Mosaic ordinances, to the very freeing of houses from
damp previously to occupation, we cannot suppose that precautionary
directions, as regards such universal and lethal maladies as epidemics,
would have been omitted. With this remarkable fact before us, derived
from sacred authority, I feel at a loss to conjecture the grounds
on which the idea of contagion is _at all entertained_, more
especially as we have the occurrence of pestilential disease not only
foretold, but their very nature and mode of production positively
conveyed to us from the same divine source.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account