A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
Those divisions of the early and middle Pleistocene which enjoyed milder
climatic conditions had an assemblage of mammals which, from one point
of view, seems very modern, for most of the genera, and even many of the
species, which now inhabit North America, date back to that time. From
the geographical standpoint, however, this is a very strange fauna, for
it contains so many animals now utterly foreign to North America, to find
near relatives of which we should have to go to Asia or South America.
Some of these animals which now seem so exotic, such as the llamas,
camels and horses, were yet truly indigenous and were derived from a long
line of ancestors which dwelt in this continent, but are now scattered
abroad and extinct in their original home, while others were migrants
that for some unknown reason failed to maintain themselves. Others again
are everywhere extinct.
[Illustration: FIG. 113.—Some of the more characteristic Pleistocene
mammals, reduced to a uniform scale, with a pointer dog (in the frame)
to show relative sizes.—1. †Columbian Elephant (_Elephas †columbi_).
2. Giant †Ground-Sloth (_†Megalonyx jeffersoni_). 3. †Stag-Moose
(_†Cervalces scotti_). 4. †American Mastodon (_†Mastodon americanus_).
5. †Giant Beaver (_†Castoroides ohioensis_). 6. †Texas Horse (_Equus
†scotti_). 7. †Sabre-tooth Tiger (_†Smilodon californicus_).]
Most surprising, perhaps, in a North American landscape, is the presence
of the Proboscidea, of which two very distinct kinds, the †mastodons and
the true elephants, are found together. Over nearly the whole of the
United States and southern Canada, and even with sporadic occurrence in
Alaska, ranged the †American Mastodon (_†Mastodon americanus_) which was
rare in the plains, but very abundant in the forested regions, where it
persisted till a very late period and was probably known to the early
Indians. This animal, while nearly related to the true elephants, was
yet quite different from them in appearance, as will be immediately
seen on comparing 1 and 4, Fig. 113, p. 195. The most obvious external
difference was the comparative shortness of the legs in the †Mastodon,
which did not exceed and seldom attained a height of 9 ft. 6 in. at the
shoulder; the head also was lower and more flattened. The teeth were
very different from those of the elephants; the grinding teeth were much
smaller and simpler, being low-crowned and rooted and having three or
four high, transverse, enamel-covered crests, without cement. The tusks
were elephant-like except that in the male there was a single small tusk
in the lower jaw, which cannot have been visible externally; this is a
remnant of an earlier stage of development, when there were two large
tusks in the lower as well as the upper jaw. The creature was covered
with long, coarse, dun-coloured hair; such hair has been found with some
of the skeletons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account