A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
To the earlier, probably middle, Miocene may be referred the wonderful
Santa Cruz fauna of Patagonia. It is extremely difficult to convey to
the reader any adequate conception of this great assemblage of mammals,
because most of them belonged to orders which have altogether vanished
from the earth and are only remotely like the forms with which we are
familiar in the northern hemisphere. To one who knows only these northern
animals, it seems like entering another world when he begins the study of
the Santa Cruz fossils. If any North American mammals had then entered
South America, which is not probable, they had not extended their range
as far as Patagonia. Marvellously rich and varied as the Santa Cruz fauna
was, it did not contain everything that we should expect to find in it;
several recent families of undoubtedly indigenous South American origin
have left no ancestors in the early Miocene formations. For this, there
are several obvious reasons. In part, these gaps in the history are
merely due to the accidents of collecting and some of them will almost
certainly be filled by future exploration. Other absentees will probably
never be found, because the Santa Cruz beds are known only in the very
far south, and the Miocene climate of the region, though much milder and
more genial than the present one, must have been unsuitable for many
tropical animals. Again, the Patagonia of that time appears to have been
a country of open plains, with few trees, and hence arboreal forms were
rare.
[Illustration: FIG. 132.—Diagram to illustrate the comparative sizes of
the Santa Cruz mammals, a modern pointer dog, within the rectangle, to
give the scale. 1. _†Cladosictis lustratus_, predaceous marsupial. 2.
_†Protypotherium australe_, †typothere. 3. _†Eocardia excavata_, rodent.
4. _†Stegotherium tesselatum_, armadillo. 5. _†Propalæohoplophorus
australis_, †glyptodont. 6. _†Hapalops longiceps_, †ground-sloth. 7.
_†Thoatherium minusculum_, †litoptern. 8. _†Astrapotherium magnum_,
†astrapothere. 9. _†Prothylacynus patagonicus_, predaceous marsupial.
10. _†Theosodon garrettorum_, †litoptern. 11. _†Nesodon imbricatus_,
†toxodont.]
While great numbers of large, flightless birds, some of them of enormous
size, were entombed in the volcanic ash and dust which were spread
over such wide areas and to such great depths, the extreme scarcity of
reptiles is surprising; a few remains of lizards have been found, but no
snakes, crocodiles, or tortoises, and we have no information as to the
plant-life of the region at that time. The mammals were almost all of
small or moderate size; only one or two species were really large.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account