A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
[Illustration: FIG. 160.—White River †titanothere (_†Titanotherium
robustum_) males fighting. Restored from a skeleton in the American
Museum of Natural History.]
In the lowest of the three substages of the White River Oligocene the
most conspicuous and abundant fossils are the †titanotheres, the latest
members of which were huge animals of almost elephantine proportions.
They belonged to four parallel, or rather slightly divergent, phyla,
differing in the development of the horns, in the shape of the head and
in the relative length and massiveness of the limbs. The teeth were all
low-crowned, or brachyodont, the canines much too small to have been of
any service as weapons and the incisors had curious little, button-shaped
crowns, which can have had little or no functional importance, since
they show hardly any wear, even in old animals. With such front teeth,
a prehensile lip and long tongue would seem to have been necessary for
gathering and taking in food.
[Illustration: FIG. 161.—Second upper molar, left side, of
_†Titanotherium_. _A._, masticating surface; _B._, outer side of crown.]
The †titanotheres were one of two perissodactyl families in which the
premolars never became so large and complex as the molars. The upper
molars had a longitudinal outer wall, composed of two deeply concave
cusps, and two internal conical cusps, but no transverse ridges; the
lower molars were composed of two crescents, one behind the other, a
pattern which was very widely distributed among the early and primitive
artiodactyls and perissodactyls.
The so-called “horns” were not strictly such, but a pair of bony
protuberances from the front of the skull and, from their shape, could
hardly have been sheathed in horn. The long, immensely broad and massive
head resembled that of some fantastic rhinoceros, as did also the body
and limbs. The brain was quite absurdly small, the cavity for it, lost in
the huge skull, would hardly contain the fist of an ordinary man; these
great beasts must have been incredibly dull and stupid, surpassing even
the modern rhinoceroses in this respect. As is generally true in mammals
which have horns, antlers, or similar weapons borne upon the skull, or
very large tusks, the bones of the brain-case were made enormously thick
and yet lightened by an intricate system of communicating cavities or
“sinuses,” separated by many bony braces and supports connecting the
inner and outer denser layers, which form the surfaces of the bones.
In this way the skull is made strong enough without any proportionate
increase of weight to endure the severe shock of impact, when the horns
or tusks are made use of. The principle is the same as the engineer
employs in designing a steel truss-bridge. The upper profile of the head
was deeply concave, just as it is in those rhinoceroses which are armed
with nasal horns.
[Illustration: FIG. 162.—Skull of _†Titanotherium elatum_. American
Museum.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account