A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
In order to find any American members of this family, it is necessary
to go back to the lower Pliocene, where a great abundance of them is
encountered, representing, according to Osborn’s view, four or five
phyla; and just as in the case of the horses of the same formation, they
were an assemblage curiously made up of progressive and old-fashioned,
conservative genera,—some were persistent native stocks, others the
descendants of immigrants from the Old World, which reached America
in the middle Miocene. There was great variety of form, size and
proportions among these animals, North America at that time having a
larger number of genera and species than Africa and Asia combined have
now. Some were quite small, some large, though none equalled the larger
modern species. Some of the genera had relatively long legs, but in one
genus, _†Teleoceras_ (Fig. 125, p. 230), an Old World type, they were
most grotesquely short, the belly almost touching the ground, as in a
hippopotamus. Most of these rhinoceroses were hornless, but _†Teleoceras_
had a small horn on the very tip of the nose. In consequence of the
lack of horns, the nasal bones were thin and weak, in marked contrast
to the massive, convex nasals of the modern species, and, for the same
reason, the upper profile of the skull was nearly straight. Except
for minor details, the dentition was in very nearly the modern stage
of development; there was a single trenchant upper incisor on each
side, a procumbent lower tusk and between the tusks a pair of small
incisors; the other incisors and the canines were already lost. One genus
(_†Peraceras_) had lost all the upper front teeth. The grinding teeth had
the same character as in the existing species, but were somewhat simpler,
owing to less development of the accessory spurs. In the more progressive
types the teeth were rather high-crowned, though in none were they
actually hypsodont; while the persistent ancient genera had teeth with
much lower crowns.
Aside from the differences in the skull, which are obviously to be
correlated with the absence or very small size of the horn, the skeleton
in these Pliocene genera differed but little from the type common to the
existing rhinoceroses, and in all the species the feet were three-toed.
In short, the dentition and skeleton, except the skull, had already
attained to substantially the modern conditions. While the Old World at
that time had both horned and hornless rhinoceroses in abundance, none
of the genera with large and fully developed horns ever migrated to
the western hemisphere. This is the more remarkable in that the great
†Woolly Rhinoceros (_Opsiceros †antiquitatis_) of the Pleistocene, which
had two very large horns, inhabited Siberia with the †Mammoth (_Elephas
†primigenius_). The latter extended its range through Alaska and the
northern United States, but the rhinoceros, for some unknown reason, did
not accompany it in its eastward wanderings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account