A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
The most ancient and primitive representative of the true rhinoceroses
so far discovered occurs in the lowest division of the White River beds
and is of particular interest as throwing light upon the origin of
the family. The genus (_†Trigonias_) differed from that (_†Cænopus_)
which was so abundant in the middle White River substage in several
highly significant particulars, though on a merely casual inspection
one might easily be misled into thinking that the two animals were
nearly identical, for _†Trigonias_ was an undoubted rhinoceros.
Such an identification, however, would be a great mistake, for the
differences, though not striking, are very important. In the upper jaw
the first or anterior incisor had already assumed the characteristic
trenchant, chisel-like shape, but two other incisors were present also,
thus bringing the number up to the original three, common to all early
perissodactyls; even more interesting is the presence of a small upper
canine. The lower jaw likewise had three incisors on each side, the
first and third small, the second enlarged and tusk-like, but the canine
had already been suppressed, and thus the dental formula was: _i_ 3/3,
_c_ 1/0, _p_ 4/4, _m_ 3/3, × 2 = 42, or 14 more than the formula of the
existing African species. The premolars were smaller and less complex
than the molars.
[Illustration: FIG. 176.—Skull of _†Trigonias osborni_, lower White
River. (After Hatcher.)]
[Illustration: FIG. 177.—Anterior end of right upper jaw of _†Trigonias
osborni_ (after Lucas). _c._, canine. _i 3_, external incisor. _i 2_,
middle incisor. _i 1_, first incisor.]
From this ancient genus may readily be inferred the steps by which the
peculiar characters of the anterior teeth in the true rhinoceroses were
attained. The first stage was undoubtedly an animal in which, as in all
other Eocene perissodactyls, there were three well-developed incisors on
each side of both jaws, 12 in all, and moderately prominent canine tusks;
all these teeth were erect. The second stage was the enlargement of the
first upper and second lower incisors, the latter becoming less erect and
beginning to assume the recumbent position; at the same time the other
incisors and the canines were reduced in size and were so little used
that they lost their functional importance. The third stage, in which
the first and second lower incisors were horizontal and pointed directly
forward, and the first upper and second lower teeth were still further
enlarged, the non-functional teeth reduced in size and the lower canine
suppressed, was realized in the genus _†Trigonias_. There were thus but
two hypothetical stages between this lower White Region genus and the
tapir-like forms of the middle Eocene, so far, at least, as the anterior
teeth are concerned.
[Illustration: FIG. 178.—Anterior end of left upper jaw of _†Cænopus_,
_A_, adult; _B_, immature animal (after Osborn). _I 1_, first incisor; _I
2_, second incisor; _C_, canine.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account