A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
[Illustration: FIG. 187.—Left manus of Pig. _S._, scaphoid. _L._, lunar.
_Py._, pyramidal. _Pis._, pisiform. _Td._, trapezoid. _M._, magnum. _U._,
unciform. _Mc. I_, second, _Mc. II_, third, _Mc. III_, fourth, _Mc. IV_,
fifth, metacarpals.]
[Illustration: FIG. 188.—Left pes of Pig. _Cal._, calcaneum. _As._,
astragalus. _N._, navicular. _Cb._, cuboid. _Cn. 2_, _Cn. 3_, second and
third cuneiforms. _Mt. II-V_, second to fifth metatarsals.]
[Illustration: FIG. 189.—Bunodont upper molar of peccary (_Tagassu_).]
[Illustration: FIG. 190.—Selenodont upper molar of deer (_Odocoileus_).]
Especially characteristic of the order is the structure of the ankle,
or “hock-joint” of the hind limb. The ankle-bone, or astragalus, has
a double pulley, the upper and lower ends being of quite similar
shape; its lower end is almost equally divided between the cuboid and
navicular, which are made concave to receive it. This type of astragalus
is altogether peculiar to the artiodactyls, all of which possess it;
it is unlike that of any other mammal whatever and may be recognized
at a glance. The calcaneum, or heel-bone, has a large convex facet, by
means of which it articulates with the fibula, or external leg-bone;
there is no such articulation in the perissodactyls. The lower end of
the calcaneum is narrow and fits into a step cut in the cuboid, which
is thus every whit as peculiar and characteristic as the calcaneum and
astragalus. The femur never has the third trochanter, which is always
present in the perissodactyls. Another respect in which the artiodactyls
differ from all perissodactyls except the horses is in the much more
complex mode of articulation between the vertebræ of the lumbar and
posterior dorsal regions, which the former display, and even the horses
have no such elaborate arrangement. Finally, another very marked
difference from the perissodactyls is in the teeth, for the premolars
and molars are never alike, and only in very rare instances does the
last premolar assume the molar-pattern. Of this pattern, there are two
principal kinds, one exemplified by the peccaries, in which the crown
supports a series, fundamentally two pairs, of conical cusps, and called
_bunodont_, and the other, to be seen in all the ruminating animals, in
which the crown is composed of two pairs of crescents and is therefore
said to be _selenodont_. The bunodont was the primitive type, whence the
other was derived, and many transitional forms are known.
The classification of the immense horde of living and extinct genera and
species which are referable to the artiodactyls is an extremely difficult
problem, which has found no thoroughly satisfactory solution and will
not until much more is learned concerning the history of the order and
conflicting opinions can be reconciled. The most important American
families and genera are given below, though the arrangement is but
tentative.
Suborder A. ARTIODACTYLA †PRIMITIVA. (Extinct genera of
doubtful affinities)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account