A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
It is customary and convenient to express the numbers and kinds of teeth
of a given mammalian species by means of a “dental formula”; for example,
in Man the formula is: _i_ 2/2, _c_ 1/1, _p_ 2/2, _m_ 3/3, × 2 = 32;
the reason for the multiplication by two is that the figures deal only
with one side of the mouth and must be doubled to give the sum total.
Just because, however, the two sides are alike, it is usual to take the
doubling for granted. Written out in full, the formula means that Man has
two incisors, one canine, two premolars and three molars on each side of
each jaw, the horizontal line indicating the division between upper and
lower teeth. The number of teeth is frequently not the same in the upper
and lower jaws; for instance, the formula for the Sheep is: _i_ 0/3, _c_
0/1, _p_ 3/3, _m_ 3/3, × 2 = 32; the total is the same as in Man, but
the arrangement is entirely different. The meaning is that in the Sheep
there are no upper incisors or canines, but three incisors and a canine
are present in each half of the lower jaw, with three premolars and
three molars on each side above and below. The Dog gives still another
formula: _i_ 3/3, _c_ 1/1, _p_ 4/4, _m_ 2/3, × 2 = 42. What is called
the typical formula for the higher terrestrial mammals above the grade
of the marsupials and which is but rarely exceeded, is _i_ 3/3, _c_ 1/1,
_p_ 4/4, _m_ 3/3, × 2 = 44, though most existing mammals have fewer teeth
than this. Compared with the typical formula, the Dog has lost but two
teeth, the third upper molar on each side, while Man and the Sheep have
each lost twelve.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account